Digging in now....
For the timeframe evaluated in this study, there isn't much difference in the COVID infection rates for Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed.
Vaxxed = 9 cases out of 19,965 participants
Unvaxxed = 169 out of 20,172 participants
What we don;t know is how COVID infections were confirmed......Was the PCR test used? If so, people with a cold or flu could have tested positive, which renders this study completely useless. BINGO! Page 21, infection was confirmed using the PCR tests!!
Looking for the cycle threshold on that PCR... I don't see it listed. That's...less than transparent.
You won't find it in the docs above. It's in this link:
New zealand.
Highly poisoned yet covid is spreading like wild fire.
Hearing the excuses makes me smile
Wish it would show vaccine side effects, sure it helps lower chances of getting the minor flu like covid but it's not worth it due to the heart problems.
Not in this batch, but hopefully we'll see that data soon...
Need I remind people this data cannot be trusted? We can play with it as much as we like. Have fun with it. But don't take it seriously.
(post is archived)