they'd presumably have some sort of proof you were driving drunk like the cop pulled you over while you were driving, you were erratic, or took a breathalyzer, my only view here is have some sort of evidence before ruining someone's life. Think of the presidence, do you want blue haired woke sjws to have even more power to cancel us with merely an accusation and no proof? Should Kavanaugh for example have not been allowed on the supreme court because a woman accused him with no proof?
Why are people in jail based on arrest warrants until they make bond or have their trials ? They investigated Kavanaugh and had zero evidence to obtain a WFA.
this guy here isn't in jail by definition if he is able to return to work, they probably went and investigated it, found no proof, probably realized the girl made it up, they'll have the trial where it will be just a part of common law process where that will be shown clearly. She was probably mad she got a bad grade or something. Now I am just speculating of course, if there is proof like his dna on her, or text messages admitting it etc, I immediately change my view of this and want him not just not working but in jail. But I see no such proof in this story. It's just like Kavanaugh.
That's what the trial will determine. And the jury will decide. He may have posted bond.
(post is archived)