This has been a total hoax since day one!
This has been a total hoax since day one!
Their excuse? They didn't have COVID samples, so they went with what they had.
So how many people really had COVID?
From the attached thread:
Look at page 39,40 "Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019nCov is the causative agent for clinical symptoms. The test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens."
Page 40 “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time, the test was developed and this study conducted, with assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV with characterized stocks ......."
Meaning they used a substitute for the COVIID virus to design the PCR test as well as validate that it works
Their excuse? They didn't have COVID samples, so they went with what they had.
So how many people really had COVID?
From the attached thread:
Look at page 39,40
"Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019nCov is the causative agent for clinical symptoms. The test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens."
Page 40
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time, the test was developed and this study conducted, with assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV with characterized stocks ......."
Meaning they used a substitute for the COVIID virus to design the PCR test as well as validate that it works
(post is archived)