So Kash Patel just revealed that the only way Clinton could have spied on Trump at the White House was through the NSA.
Charlie Kirk interview with Kash Patel: https://files.catbox.moe/ky7kq8.mp4
Who was the 17th director of the NSA?
Why did Admiral Mike Rogers hold an off the books meeting at Trump Tower in November 2016?
Why did Trump immediately move his operations out of Trump Tower after the meeting?
Why did Mike Rogers meet with John Durham on multiple occasions?
Now ask yourself the most important question:
If Trump already knew about the spying through Rogers, why was it still going on in February of 2017 when he was already in the White House?
Because this was always a sting.
How do you capture a very dangerous animal?
BAIT.
By the time Q started posting in October 2017, it was already over. They've had the goods on everybody this entire time.
This was never about PROVING that they did it.
It was always about PREPARING THE PUBLIC TO ACCEPT that they did it.
Changing a narrative that people have had drilled into them for 70 years that the government is corrupt and there's nothing you can do about it takes time.
Even now you see these lost souls in comments sections moaning about how "Muh'nuthin'sgunnahappun" at the precise moment nuclear bombs are going off in the news about traitors spying on the President of the United States in the White House.
They don't seem to get that they are the ones who have always been standing in the way of real change.
They fight to defend the very mental Matrix they claim to hate like a prisoner afraid to leave their cell.
"But, but, but . . . if the fake news doesn't report it IT DOESN'T COUNT!"
Cool story. You want them to pat you on the head and give you a cookie too?
Grow up. Fake news is dead. We are the news now.
Kash said the intel community must be complicit. That would include the CIA, right?
That said, I'm pretty sure the NSA knew all about it.
I want to believe. That is all encouraging, and perhaps it will fit when we understand the pieces.
Perhaps we have an honest patron.
Possibly....and possibly not.
Why did Admiral Mike Rogers hold an off the books meeting at Trump Tower in November 2016?
To tell Trump about the FISA surveillance - surveillance that Rogers had known about since March/April of 2016. Perhaps a better question would be "Why did Rogers wait until AFTER Trump was elected instead of alerting him early on? The possibility exists that Rogers HAD to do do something to ingratiate himself to Trump after Trump's surprise 2016 win. The Globalists needed to ensure they kept people on the inside.
Why did Trump immediately move his operations out of Trump Tower after the meeting?
Bc of the surveillance - which also suggest that, had Trump known about the surveillance in April of 2016, he would have moved to NJ then and prevented six months of surveillance.
Why did Mike Rogers meet with John Durham on multiple occasions?
After meeting with Trump in November of 2016 what other choice did he have? It would look quite suspicious for Rogers to approach Trump in November of 2016 and then not cooperate with Durham. Why did guilty-as-heck Jake Sullivan cooperate with Durham?
Because this was always a sting.
I agree - but it's possible that Roger's was caught in the trap.
How do you capture a very dangerous animal?
Pretend that you're grateful for his (Rogers) "help."
By the time Q started posting in October 2017, it was already over. They've had the goods on everybody this entire time.
Yes.
This was never about PROVING that they did it. It was always about PREPARING THE PUBLIC TO ACCEPT that they did it.
It was about both - the public has to see the evidence in order to believe it.
They don't seem to get that they are the ones who have always been standing in the way of real change. They fight to defend the very mental Matrix they claim to hate like a prisoner afraid to leave their cell.
People like ArchiveAnon may also be standing in the way of real change by putting Rogers on a pedestal without researching with whom and what Rogers is involved.
"But, but, but . . . if the fake news doesn't report it IT DOESN'T COUNT!"
Actually, the fake news DID report on Rogers - as evidenced by ArchiveAnon using a post from Globalist fake news, NPR, about Rogers going to Trump and cooperating with Durham. This could very well be an attempt to persuade the public that Rogers is working with Trump - when he may not be.
I knew I’d hear from you on this one. Excellent as usual. Glad you made it back in!
Thanks - and thanks for your help. Still not sure what the problem was.
Yes, I seem to be the only one with doubts about Rogers. I hope I'm wrong.
The Jan 14, 2021, Admiral Rogers did an interview with Don Lemon on CNN. When I watched the interview on youtube it made my heart sink!
I wasn’t prepared for a such a kick in the gut from Admiral Rogers
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UINDvaZqwqU
![Interesting theory from ArchiveAnon: It was over before Q made his first post, the NSA had to be involved in spying on White House, and Admiral Rogers. I understand Admiral Rogers is a very controversial figure in the community, I just found this interesting. [1005x745 - 629KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/v1YE1K.png){kind=link}
(post is archived)