WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.5K

Sounds like he is off on the right path.

Sounds like he is off on the right path.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Bullshit.

The tribe said. We need a Colony of our own.

So they encouraged ambitious traitors to speak the words they were given to say and just like today sheep bayed.

Muh no taxation (2%) without muh representation.

You yanks have never fuking had representatives and sure as shit youre paying a lot more in taxes. Have made a safe haven for the tribe. Bled treasure and lives fighting the tribes wars.

And now they are done with you they are exterminating you.

Your origins is a complete lie

[–] 1 pt

This kind of rhetoric keeps popping up lately, but I don't think whoever it is, including you, has a damn clue what they're talking about. Washington was a Mason. Many of the Founding Fathers were familiar with what you normalfags call "Occult" (the word means hidden and your bland and simple connotations only show how foolish you are). They understood the Mysteries and they practiced them. Some of them were assholes, yeah. Not all of them were great men, or at least as great as History is going to want them to have been, but they understood more than what bottom-feeders who understand far less than they think could hope to know. Washington and his circles noticed and communicated about the Jesuit infestation and it wasn't any secret or anything. Plenty of them knew about it. Even in to Lincoln's time, people, including Lincoln himself, spoke to the "infestation" affecting local lodges and more kinds of systems. Now, back in those days, Masonry wasn't all faggots with dicks in their ass trying to do some spooky asshole magic shit that explaining to any of you would never be worth anything. So maybe I don't blame you for that part. But it wasn't until noses started coming here (kek it wasn't at the beginning of the colonial formations, you buffoon) a bit later on that your ambiguous references even begin to make sense. Were there slave trades and shit? Yeah, sure. But those guys back in those days felt pretty strongly about infestations of the nose variety. Maybe just read even the basics of literature from the era and you'll find the off-putting sentiments that most mentions of the small hats conjured.

It's time to read a book, big guy.

[–] 0 pt

The tribe partly funded the Civil War. Yes it was a civil war that resulted in independence.

So what are you arguing?

Never mind the fuking Haym Salomon not only provided funding but was a free Mason.

[–] 0 pt

I'm saying things worked differently back in those days. Some noses were cool back then, but most of them were highly regarded as sleuths. Acclimation was much more common. This was back when whites had a far greater foothold. A lot of tiny hats were keen on being apart of the white culture and not all of them were fond of royalty (I wonder why). I'm arguing that colonialists weren't "ambitious traitors." That kind of Liberalism, the original kind, was done with high-IQ and well-organized white men in mind. This should be apparent to anyone that's not stupid. Therefore, these are the kinds of men that don't need some king to keep them in line. They understand that working together and prospering as sovereign beings could procure a valuable future in which they don't have to be told how nice they have to be to some guy that's in charge, but rather they can elect someone to represent their interests.

Liberalism, the classic kind, is for smart people. Conservatives only think they way they do because they're bothered by the retards around them. Do I think Monarchy is bad? Nah, not at all. But I don't have any business having some fucking faggot's hand to kiss. I'm a big boy. I can govern myself, not kill or steal and contribute positively to a flourishing future, all without some retard lording over me.

This is what shaped the Founding Fathers' outlook. But have fun being a cuck, I guess.

[–] 0 pt

You yanks have never fuking had representatives and sure as shit youre paying a lot more in taxes. Have made a safe haven for the tribe. Bled treasure and lives fighting the tribes wars. And now they are done with you they are exterminating you. Your origins is a complete lie

Go on, tell me more, I'm listening. I think you're a GCHQ britfag and full of shit, but I'm willing to hear you out.

[–] 0 pt

First place to start is the tribe infiltrated freemason Washington riding to quell the whiskey rebellion. Muh representative.

Next place is exactly how onorous was the Empire in comparison.

This leads to the undeniable recognition that the Civil War of 1776 that pitted brother against brother was completely fabricated with the tribe once again up to their neck in it.

[–] 1 pt

First place to start is the tribe infiltrated freemason

It's plausible that the freemasons were tribe even back then, but I haven't personally seen evidence of it.

Washington riding to quell the whiskey rebellion. Muh representative.

Standard politics, even for guys fighting a war of independance.

that pitted brother against brother was completely fabricated with the tribe once again up to their neck in it.

It could only be the case that the king was in on it then. Why?

Because he would have understood the symbolic importance of a tax on tea.

A huge variety of social gatherings, and every day social functions, like business meetings, and family gatherings, and even just lunch and dinner, were organized around tea. It was considered simultenously quintessentially american, and quintessentially british. The tax on tea was therefore considered an attack on the family unit and their very way of life. The importance of it cannot be overstated. To tax it was no different than a punch to the mouth.

And just like a punch to the mouth, it can and did start a bloody fight.

And that wasn't the only insult from the crown.

The question you really have to ask is not, was 1776 a bad war, but would the u.s. be better off TODAY if it rejoined Britain?

To see Britain not only over run by immigrants, but the most lawless and violent variety, and the abuses it has committed against its own citizens in the name of punishing "hate speech", I must conclude the u.s. would not be better off under the arms and protection of the Queen.

The Brits are no more competent at holding on to an empire, or preventing subversion, than any other nation.

Britain does have one thing going, which is recognizing that democracy doesn't work. If they were smart they would even eliminate the MPs, and foster nationalism.

Democracy is a fools errand.

[–] [deleted] -1 pt

Says the limey that has to walk around the no go zones to get to work with a mask on his way to get the 8th booster.

[–] 1 pt

How are those Jan 6 protestor doing?

Enjoy your election steal much?

Liking all those legal chimp out loot burn murders?

Me thinks fukwits shouldn't cast stones.

Also the tribe sends its thanks for defending their historic revisionism

[–] [deleted] -1 pt

Says the limey that has to walk around the no go zones to get to work with a mask on his way to get the 8th booster