WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

689

Sounds like he is off on the right path.

Sounds like he is off on the right path.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

This kind of rhetoric keeps popping up lately, but I don't think whoever it is, including you, has a damn clue what they're talking about. Washington was a Mason. Many of the Founding Fathers were familiar with what you normalfags call "Occult" (the word means hidden and your bland and simple connotations only show how foolish you are). They understood the Mysteries and they practiced them. Some of them were assholes, yeah. Not all of them were great men, or at least as great as History is going to want them to have been, but they understood more than what bottom-feeders who understand far less than they think could hope to know. Washington and his circles noticed and communicated about the Jesuit infestation and it wasn't any secret or anything. Plenty of them knew about it. Even in to Lincoln's time, people, including Lincoln himself, spoke to the "infestation" affecting local lodges and more kinds of systems. Now, back in those days, Masonry wasn't all faggots with dicks in their ass trying to do some spooky asshole magic shit that explaining to any of you would never be worth anything. So maybe I don't blame you for that part. But it wasn't until noses started coming here (kek it wasn't at the beginning of the colonial formations, you buffoon) a bit later on that your ambiguous references even begin to make sense. Were there slave trades and shit? Yeah, sure. But those guys back in those days felt pretty strongly about infestations of the nose variety. Maybe just read even the basics of literature from the era and you'll find the off-putting sentiments that most mentions of the small hats conjured.

It's time to read a book, big guy.

[–] 0 pt

The tribe partly funded the Civil War. Yes it was a civil war that resulted in independence.

So what are you arguing?

Never mind the fuking Haym Salomon not only provided funding but was a free Mason.

[–] 0 pt

I'm saying things worked differently back in those days. Some noses were cool back then, but most of them were highly regarded as sleuths. Acclimation was much more common. This was back when whites had a far greater foothold. A lot of tiny hats were keen on being apart of the white culture and not all of them were fond of royalty (I wonder why). I'm arguing that colonialists weren't "ambitious traitors." That kind of Liberalism, the original kind, was done with high-IQ and well-organized white men in mind. This should be apparent to anyone that's not stupid. Therefore, these are the kinds of men that don't need some king to keep them in line. They understand that working together and prospering as sovereign beings could procure a valuable future in which they don't have to be told how nice they have to be to some guy that's in charge, but rather they can elect someone to represent their interests.

Liberalism, the classic kind, is for smart people. Conservatives only think they way they do because they're bothered by the retards around them. Do I think Monarchy is bad? Nah, not at all. But I don't have any business having some fucking faggot's hand to kiss. I'm a big boy. I can govern myself, not kill or steal and contribute positively to a flourishing future, all without some retard lording over me.

This is what shaped the Founding Fathers' outlook. But have fun being a cuck, I guess.

[–] 0 pt

Mate we disagree.

This evil plot that sees our world in thrall goes back at least centuries and our ancestors warned us of the synagogue of Satan millenia ago. Pre Bible.

Stay safe. Question everything.

BTW I consider the tribe infiltrated and subverted by Satanists. Heck not even the pope is catholic anymore