> There are people that want to disrupt progress because of faults that have built up. Instead of trying to fix problems, they'd rather burn it all down. They may as well be enemies of The Republic too. Sounds like no one ever explained accelerationism to you. There are non-fixable and fatal problems that have arose in modern western nations, that *can't* be fixed without either a *catastrophe now*, or a much worse, much *larger* catastrophe later. What is proposed, is natural. It is no different than when farmers burn fields and forests to prevent too great a build up dead material which might lead to much more destructive fires. Likewise in nature, there are species of trees that can *only* sprout after fire. The same is true of civilization. For something new to be created, the old has to die. This is the way of things, it is necessary, and we should encourage the collapse, and accelerate it, to preserve that which is worth preserving.