How hard would it be to track clots/hear attacks/etc. (not just deaths) over time? seems that if they can cover "covid cases" with accuracy at the day (or smaller) level, that they could also give us this information.
This would be an open and shut case, what did it look like in November of 2019 vs November 2021? "Oh, it didn't change even though 1B shots were given in the US", well i guess it isn't a thing then, "oh, it tripled in the US over all, and is 10x higher for those under 18", well then we have a problem.
I was just thinking the same thing this afternoon. They tracked Covid cases/deaths/hospitalizations with pin-point accuracy for over a year, but they can't do the same for these adverse events? Is it not logical to assume, because they could with Covid, they can now, but they choose not to? If so, Why?
(post is archived)