I can't find that metric. Which drop down did you use under the "Metrics" column?
Closest I can find is:
"Vaccine doses, cases, ICU patients, and deaths"
It would be an AMAZING metric if we had data that tracked lab confirmed positive cases per 100k, by vaccination status.
King County (here in the US) tracks a very similar metric and here's their current result (much larger data sets than Ontario):
My guess as to why it is so much work in the US compared to Canada: we are fatter than folks in Ontario? That's just a guess. I don't have the data.
And so you know I'm approaching this honestly, I strongly believe we will NEVER be able to vaccinated our way out of this. Ever. It mutates every 3-6 months and the cycle starts over.
Right below the data on ICU and Hospitalization: "COVID-19 cases by vaccination status" and then has an interactive graph that shows number per 100,000.
Ahhh, I was looking at the wrong link.
Yes, I see that, now.
Since a higher number per 100K are fully vaccinated, we should expect those numbers to be directly proportional to their percentages.
Percent are fully vaccinated in Canada: 77.8% Percent unvaccinated in Canada: 16%
So of all the cases, if the vaccines did nothing, we'd expect 77.8% of all cases per 100K to be fully vaccinated, 16% for the unvaccinated. Here are the raw numbers:
9782 total
So if the vaccines did nothing, of those cases that number should be ~7611 (77.85 of 9782 cases).
It's not. It's 7673. Which means it is OVER-represented by a little bit.
Dude...you found a pretty good stat/piece of information.
Wish there was a way to get this discovery more visibility.
, take a look at what discovered. The fully vaccinated folks are slightly overrepresented in Ontario's lab-confirmed positive COVID-19 cases.
Thanks for looking at this with me. Should we repost it as a new post? It would be interesting to see if we can find similar data from other sources.
(post is archived)