It is a national embarrassment that someone on our country's highest court can make a statement like that.
Sure is.
Why would a supreme court justice have to read the constitution?
The short answer to OP's question is no. No she has not. And why would she? That's not what she was appointed for.
Next thing, you'll be expecting the "Houseplant of The United States" to know where he is, what day it is, or have the capacity to construct (or at be able to read) a coherent sentence.
Yet there they are being listened to. And basking in all their ignorant glory waiting to puke more idiocy.
Sad state of affairs
(post is archived)