WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

423

If these are experimental jabs that means that some people, the experimental group, are getting the real thing while others, the control group, are getting the placebo. A person qualifies for a jab certificate, giving them access to travel/access to certain venues regardless of which group they're in.

What is the difference between granting access to the placebo group and granting access to the jab refusers in terms of posing a health risk to others? NOTHING. If this doesn't prove that this has nothing to do with health and everything to do with control, I don't know what does, and I haven't seen it mentioned.

If these are experimental jabs that means that some people, the experimental group, are getting the real thing while others, the control group, are getting the placebo. A person qualifies for a jab certificate, giving them access to travel/access to certain venues regardless of which group they're in. What is the difference between granting access to the placebo group and granting access to the jab refusers in terms of posing a health risk to others? NOTHING. If this doesn't prove that this has nothing to do with health and everything to do with control, I don't know what does, and I haven't seen it mentioned.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

I've pointed this exact same thing out.

[–] 1 pt

The data becomes even more complex when a Pfizer insider said last year that there are actually ten separate variants of the Pfizer not-vaccine, including the saline placebo. So far private labs in Japan have found five of them, including the saline placebo.

The experiment is more complex than people realize. It was just too big a research opportunity to pass up, especially if you are immune to any legal consequences and some of the data won't become available until some of the children getting stabbed now won't reach maturity (child-bearing age) for another decade at least.

[–] 0 pt

Why does that not surprise me? ;-)