Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

487

If these are experimental jabs that means that some people, the experimental group, are getting the real thing while others, the control group, are getting the placebo. A person qualifies for a jab certificate, giving them access to travel/access to certain venues regardless of which group they're in.

What is the difference between granting access to the placebo group and granting access to the jab refusers in terms of posing a health risk to others? NOTHING. If this doesn't prove that this has nothing to do with health and everything to do with control, I don't know what does, and I haven't seen it mentioned.

If these are experimental jabs that means that some people, the experimental group, are getting the real thing while others, the control group, are getting the placebo. A person qualifies for a jab certificate, giving them access to travel/access to certain venues regardless of which group they're in. What is the difference between granting access to the placebo group and granting access to the jab refusers in terms of posing a health risk to others? NOTHING. If this doesn't prove that this has nothing to do with health and everything to do with control, I don't know what does, and I haven't seen it mentioned.

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

I've pointed this exact same thing out.

[–] • 1 pt

The data becomes even more complex when a Pfizer insider said last year that there are actually ten separate variants of the Pfizer not-vaccine, including the saline placebo. So far private labs in Japan have found five of them, including the saline placebo.

The experiment is more complex than people realize. It was just too big a research opportunity to pass up, especially if you are immune to any legal consequences and some of the data won't become available until some of the children getting stabbed now won't reach maturity (child-bearing age) for another decade at least.

[–] • 0 pt

Why does that not surprise me? ;-)

[–] • 0 pt

what you are suggesting is not happening. I thought so too at first, but looking at the data here https://howbad.info/ you would see a huge number of deaths if there are good and bad batches.

[–] • 0 pt

what you are suggesting is not happening.

Do you mean that there's no control group? Maybe there isn't - we've been lied to so thoroughly, how we would we know?

looking at the data here https://howbad.info/ you would see a huge number of deaths if there are good and bad batches.

1) How do we know that this site has accurate data?

2) Why would we see a huge number of deaths if there are good and bad batches?

3) Good and bad batches are not the same as a placebo vs. a "vaccine."

I'm not giving you a hard time - just want to better understand what you're saying.

One of the other things I wonder about is if there are control and experimental groups, technically the control group would be receiving the ingredient that would cause immunity. But there are many ingredients in the jab, including graphene. Would a placebo contain that as well?

[–] • 0 pt

I am saying the numbers for all batches look so similar that the bad and good batches theory is pretty weak.