Watching the video: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/01/07/child-mortality-covid-shot.aspx RN lists a bunch of anecdotes and no actual science. VAERS is also not science. Just like she said she was told. She should realize that. There's absolutely stupid shit on VAERS like people getting into a motorcycle accident. "I have friends in other hospitals" is not science. She literally says this. The only thing someone has to do, and they exist by the thousands, is say the same things as she is saying but the opposite. And then also say, "I have friends in other hospitals." This is what is being said/tweeted/posted/commented to the tune of thousands. Thousands of nurses and doctors crying and whining about all their unvaccinated patients dying. Tweet after tweet, post after post, comment after comment. Since there are far more of those, does that mean these nurses and doctors are more correct? Answer: No. It's still not science. Her entire speech is an appeal to emotion. Not a shred of actual credible science. You will never make changes with appeal to emotion. You need hard data. And when we get into the actual research, the actual science: it does not match with what she is saying. The first time she mentions actual science, it is other medical tech, not vaccines. She mentions "10 years later" for another drug family entirely: chemotherapy causing cancer up to 10 years later. She mentions that it was researched. A standard she is not holding any other point to in her lengthy diatribe about the vaccines. "Cancers, autoimmune, infertility, we just don't know." Yes, we do. We know the pharmacokinetics as well the the immunological targets with these vaccines. These are known quantities. We also have actual real science on the side effects for these vaccines. We have plenty of actual science (and not anecdotes from friends). Had she been honest, she would point out that the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines are the ones causing blood clots EXTREMELY rarely.