![20,000 images now under seal [1080x1340 - 173KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/KOVVRO.jpg){kind=link}
You seem to forget that thousands of these 'indictments' were already under seal long before Durham even began/ took over investigating
Again not true. When do you think Durham actually started investigating? And Huber? When did these sealed indictments start to pile up? How many do you think there are at this point? Why would anyone create so many sealed indictments over this time that are on record if they were trying to hide things?
And all this means is they have been busy placing them under seal and out of 'prosecutorial reach' since forever.
Where are there any sealed indictments on record that have been used to hide things, from before Trump came along, that would validate your claim?
You obviously don't understand how the system works. You're either making shit up or getting wrong info.
An indictment is a grand jury decision, not just a charge by a state or federal prosecutor. So as far as 'prosecutorial reach' is concerned, it's not even an issue here.
I'm not going to explain this over again, especially with some anon I don't recognize who just popped up out of nowhere to lay down some bullshit. Do your own homework instead of guessing or listening to someone else who doesn't know shit.
You can check these facts out with some digging:
Durham started his investigations on the same day Q started posting: Oct. 28, 2017.
Huber started his investigations on Nov. 13, 2017.
The Pacer records from Oct. 30, 2017 - June 30, 2018
https://files.catbox.moe/qp80jr.jpg
- The Pacer records from Oct. 30, 2017 - Sept. 30, 2020
https://files.catbox.moe/xbht3q.jpg
Do you really think this is the way they cover up crimes???
You know nothing. Don't bother me with your bullshit.
Lolz, you're upset cause i don't believe your ridiculous bs ?/.
Sealed indictments preclude it from being able to be lawfully/ legally used in any Judicial or prosecutorial setting unless it is unsealed at a later date. True or false. So While sealed - no-one (in any general sense ) can access the information or publish said information ? . Do you think Obama sealed all his College and Birth records bc he's gathering evidence against himself. Or was it to permanently prevent the records from being available . When the JFK records were sealed, was it bc they were going break it all wide open 65 yrs later ??. Or a way to prevent access to the information?.
Do you think all the thousands of records that are sealed each year (direct evidence of bad cops/ corrupt govt practice/ official malfeasance, sexual misconduct by those in authority etc) is bc it's waiting for just the right time to swing into action and bring justice or that it is what it is - sealing records therefore preventing any ability to bring them forth publicly or judicially.
You want to believe - good for you. But don't expect others to follow in your delusion.
You need to learn how to do research, and how not to be such a fucking prick.
I don't read long posts that start off with insults.
Have a great New Year,
Lol, down vote all you want .
Sorry you seem to have a mental block and are unable to even comprehend that Sealing indictments are also a legal means of classification to set aside Investigative/ prosecutorial case evidence out of public purview and dissemination - there is zero legal guaranteed it will be unsealed, zero legal guarantee it will be prosecuted. How is that not 'covering up crimes' - 'But why would they have them on file if they wanted to cover them up ??' - Easy, how does Comey tell the public straight faced 'She did not have intent to commit crimes', or Fauci and all the talking heads repeatedly tell the public straight faced 'the vaccine is safe and effective'. Simple bc they are corrupt and don't care what we think.
All you have are thousands of sealed indictments - with no actual detail of who or exactly what they relate too and contain.
Another down vote huh ??. You actually believe the Govt/ the Judiciary and the Investigating Agencies are all going to Investigate/ Convict and punish themselves ?? Wahahahaahaaa ....
'I don't read long posts that start off with insults.'
I will not read anything that upsets me even a little ...
EDIT: I see you didn't refute what i said about the sealing of indictments also legally prevents it from being used and or disseminated to the public. Ergo - simply remaining sealed prevents it been exposed and acted upon. That you are unable to even acknowledge that point, shows a clear lack of clarity and versatility of mind. You really think the Judicial system and the investigating Govt agency's are on your side ??. Yes, yes you do .....
Enjoy your fallacies ...
(post is archived)