Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

280

By their fruit you will know them. All roads lead to Rome.

Faculty members of the School of Education at Loyola University Maryland argued recently that while there are many topics that should be kept at the collegiate level because they are too advanced or inappropriate for children, Critical Race Theory (CRT) is not among them.

In an essay published at the Jesuit-led Loyola website, at the start of the academic year, Benjamin Parker, Ph.D., Christine Mahady, Ed.D., and David Marcovitz, Ph.D., did not bother to participate in the many denials by K-12 school administrators and teachers’ union bosses that CRT is being taught in their districts.

Instead, the Loyola faculty members praised the widely discredited “1619 Project” as a “landmark work” and “educative tool to be used to initiate honest and representative discussions in schools of the enduring legacy of slavery.”

The academics criticized the firestorm about CRT created by parents and concerned citizens in many K-12 districts:

For too long K-12 schools have been overly deferential in their approach to teaching anything that could be perceived as sensitive, political, or controversial. The result of this “neutral” stance is a large population of students that have never engaged in thoughtful or critical discussions about the role that race plays in society and the intersections of identity, place, power, and opportunity. Those discussions should not be limited only to college-bound students. There are plenty of topics that are reserved for the collegiate level and have difficulty translating to K-12 schools because they are too specific, advanced, or inappropriate for children. However, CRT does not fit those criteria.

>By their fruit you will know them. All roads lead to Rome. Faculty members of the School of Education at Loyola University Maryland argued recently that while there are many topics that should be kept at the collegiate level because they are too advanced or inappropriate for children, Critical Race Theory (CRT) is not among them. In an essay published at the Jesuit-led Loyola website, at the start of the academic year, Benjamin Parker, Ph.D., Christine Mahady, Ed.D., and David Marcovitz, Ph.D., did not bother to participate in the many denials by K-12 school administrators and teachers’ union bosses that CRT is being taught in their districts. Instead, the Loyola faculty members praised the widely discredited “1619 Project” as a “landmark work” and “educative tool to be used to initiate honest and representative discussions in schools of the enduring legacy of slavery.” The academics criticized the firestorm about CRT created by parents and concerned citizens in many K-12 districts: For too long K-12 schools have been overly deferential in their approach to teaching anything that could be perceived as sensitive, political, or controversial. The result of this “neutral” stance is a large population of students that have never engaged in thoughtful or critical discussions about the role that race plays in society and the intersections of identity, place, power, and opportunity. Those discussions should not be limited only to college-bound students. There are plenty of topics that are reserved for the collegiate level and have difficulty translating to K-12 schools because they are too specific, advanced, or inappropriate for children. However, CRT does not fit those criteria.

(post is archived)

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, but aren't Jesuits good people?

[–] • 0 pt

Good God NO! They should be called the Society of Satan but then they wouldn't get as many recruits.

This is what Samuel Morse (Morse Code Inventor) had to say about them in the early 1800's:

They are Jesuits. This [Roman Catholic] society of men, after exerting their tyranny for upwards of two hundred years, at length became so formidable to the world, threatening the entire subversion to all social order, that even the Pope [i.e., Clement XIV], whose devoted subjects they [i.e., the Jesuits] are, and must be, by the vow of their society, was compelled to dissolve them [in 1773]. They had not been suppressed, however, for fifty years, before the waning influence of Popery and Despotism required their useful labors to resist the light of Democratic liberty, and the Pope (Pius VII) simultaneously with the formation of the Holy Alliance [in Europe], revived the order of the Jesuits in all their power. ((Ed. Comment: Pope Pius VII restored the Jesuit Order in 1814 in exchange for his release from prison, where he had spent five years under Jesuit “persuasion”.) And do Americans need to be told what Jesuits are? If any are ignorant, let them inform themselves of their history without delay; no time is to be lost; their workings are before you in every day’s events; they are a secret society, a sort of Masonic order with super added features of revolting odiousness, and a thousand times more dangerous. They are not merely priests, or priests of one religious creed; they are merchants, and lawyers, and editors, and men of any profession, having no outward badge (in this country [i.e., the USA]) by which to be recognized; they are about in all your society. They can assume any character, that of angels of light, or ministers of darkness, to accomplish their one great end, the service upon which they are sent, whatever that service may be.

They [i.e., the Jesuits] are educated men, prepared, and sworn to start at any moment, and in any direction, and for any service, commanded by the general of their order [i.e., the Jesuit Superior General, the “Black Pope”], bound to no family, community, or country, by the ordinary ties which bind men; and sold for life to the cause of the Roman Pontiff.”

[–] • 1 pt

Rome never died. We just gave it a new name.

[–] • 0 pt

Spot on! It went from the Roman Empire to the Holy Roman Empire. The second one having way more wealth and power than the first one. All hidden under the cloak of Christianity.