WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts (edited )

Trump gives credibility to the poison vax. The Supreme Court can then be justified in ruling in favor of mandates for the poison vax.

This is exactly the intent. The slow walk.

For christs fucking sake he actually approved warp speed. How fucking obvious can it get.

The GOP is the slow-mode of the DNC. And everyone who is fucking anyone knows it by now.

I said a year ago, when the GOP failed to overturn the election, that the shell-game of "whats underneath the RNC shell" (the DNC), was over, it was just a matter of time at that point.

And I was right. The RNC is dumber than a houseplant and the DNC has their arm balls-deep in the corpse of the party, working it like a handpuppet, while old men like ron paul uselessly scream at the sky, and sold out enemies of the people bloviate from their grand stands about how they're gonna fight for us, and gatekeeping "alt right" news sites like gateway pundit issue EXPLOSIVE EPIC BAM! BOOM! style headlines like the comic book sound effect laugh track to clown worlds applause light on a dying nation.

Traitors. Traitors before enemies.

Should be our motto. Our watchword. Our gold standard for a new party.

"If you elect us we will EXPLICITLY weaponize the DOJ against the RNC, and then the DNC, and ask for the death penalty for treason and the crime of denying the american people useful legitimate representation. We will pursue the death penalty to the fullest for any and all financial crimes exceeding half a million dollars, or those that impacted the destitute, the pregnant, the elderly, veterans, or the young. We will outlaw corporate personhood and audit all federal funding, both DoD and public, to social media sites in relation to their listed stock prices, and outlaw, on felony punishment of individual executives, stock buybacks purchased with loans. Almost every single wallstreet bank and firm, and their respectives executives will be investigated for felony crimes of fraud, racketeering, and illegal influence on congress and the senate, and if found guilty by an impartial judge, shot by the national guard. This is our campaign platform, this is our pledge to you, the american people."

We would also outlaw anyone with a law degree, past, present, or future, from working in the federal, state, or local government, except, naturally, for DAs and defense attorneys.

This and dozens of other reforms would be pushed through, using deputized state police and soldiers if necessary, without appeal to the law or constitution.

I would rip the core out of the cancerous rotten blight of america, right out of the black bleeding heart of the federal government, without concern for decorum, process, or law.

And when I or the party is finally done, either nothing would remain from the fight they would bring against us, or else people would speak our names for two and a half centuries, and know that immortal quote of all true republics.

"Give me liberty, or give me death or we'll take it from your cold dead hands."

[–] 3 pts

I would rip the core of the bleeding rotten blight right out of the black bleeding heart of the federal government, without concern for decorum, process, or law.

Colonel Kurtz was right.

"Horror has a face. You must make a friend of horror. Horror, and moral terror. If you do not make them your friends, they are your enemies to be feared."

[–] 1 pt

"Horror has a face. You must make a friend of horror. Horror, and moral terror. If you do not make them your friends, they are your enemies to be feared."

Outstanding timing with the quote.

[–] 1 pt

If I had ten divisions of men like you, our troubles in this country would soon be over.

Do you think it would be possible to ban dual nationality people from politics, or interference and lobbying from foreign governments into your manifesto, or would that be likely to end the movement before it even started?

I look at photos such as the one attached to this post, and also certain laws politicians like this one enact to the benefit of a certain group, and it's pretty obvious that they are bought and paid for and that there is an unspoken agreement that if they don't bend the knee they can expect to have any political campaign torpedoed by the press. It's a bit like with the cartels when they offer you a choice of 'silver or lead'.

Like with Trump - he was permitted to appeal to the national interest as long as he agreed to wear the tiny hat and be photographed praying at the wall, without that there would have been zero right wing press coverage and it was only his preternatural command of social media that carried him through - a tool that has since been kneecapped.

We saw this in the UK with Jeremy Corbyn when he lead the labour party - he was completely isolated by a coordinated pressure campaign lead by certain foreign interests in the press and it was incredibly effective, even now he is an outcast from his own political party, on the naughty step. (The contract is still on the table though - 'all you have to do is wear the tiny hat and let us photograph you praying at the wall and you can come back in from the cold'). Silver or lead.

Maybe resources would be more effectively utilized placed into competing information dispersal systems, rather than nascent political movements; social media networks, broadcast and press - to provide mainstream avenues for politicians to exercise their free speech and reach their audience with less fear of being blacklisted, like Poal, Gab etc. The reach isn't mainstream yet but it's a move in the right direction.

Until those networks are more established you will probably only get the compromised candidates like DeSantis and Trump - candidates who bear the seal of imperial conditioning from the outset, and whose loyalties have been pre-approved.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

First, its not a manifesto. Thats a word subversive homos use. I take it you're not a subversive homo, so don't.

The way the u.s. and western allies operate is almost to a letter how the cartels operate.

Once you observe the entire beast for what it is, you stop denouncing their methods, and only denounce their goals.

There is a situation where on the one hand the media doesn't actually need views for revenue, and on the otherhand the basis of their funding relies on how much influence they wield over the public. If their propaganda fails, the regime pivots to cutting funding and giving it to others, like social media.

And so we get these arguments about whether its really about views or if views are completely irrelevant, and actually the answer is that its both.

The media can't afford to ignore stories that can't be ignored, and can afford to ignore stories it must ignore. This seems like a no-brainer, or a tautology, but it highlights a key difference between the stories that get covered and the stories that don't:

In order to control a developing narrative, either one they created or one that emerged naturally, they must cover it.

Thats why they cover the party infighting. Of course the parties know this, and early on as the modern conventions reformed themselves into what they are today, they would have exploited this to boost visibility.

The same is true for outsider parties. A false dialectic, so designed, fights itself because the drama creates legitimacy, psychological distance between two fronts of the same party, and largely avoids the issue of having to fight much more powerful parties, while appearing weak and harmless. And for the networks again, they want to shape and control outcomes, and its free entertainment for their viewers.

Thats the basis of the antifa-proudboys/alt-right fights going on in the street, a new radicalism, and its almost entirely promoted from within by the u.s. government. Congressmen or senators might have some hands in it sure, because thats inevitable, but what I think is happening, is some major institutions, maybe the intelligence agencies and the DoD, are co-opted by foreign powers, sold us out, and want to create a powder keg environment to replace congress and the senate. Imagine not just a manchurian candidate, but a manchurian government. The u.s. as a vassal state.

Think back to rome (thats an overdone meme, I know, but think back to it), and consider: The goths took over one half after sacking it, and started the balkanization process, that lead to the dark ages, that lead to the system of fiefdom and vassalage. Meanwhile the other half of rome (the byzantines) kept on existing for a thousand year.

Now think about that.

The DoD predicts civil war, while experts actually worth their salt, say 'no'. Meanwhile other experts say "not a civil war but balkanization". And we have the demographics for that splintering. Half the world still relies on the u.s. fiat dollar system, so if this was an organized tear down over the last 50 years, and theres no reason to assume it wasn't, then the u.s. dollar and its backers can't simply vanish.

The thinking then is that the u.s. splits in half, one half distingegrates into a "civil war", into individual blocs or mixture of individual states and blocs, almost a replay of the sovietization-and-then-breakup. And the other half continues on, a vassalge, which mostly continues to exist as a threat to control the rate of the failure of the dollar. This large segment maybe goes catholic, but more likely the balkanized states do, while some other denomination dominates the large bloc half of the remaining u.s.

If the intent is to have a tighter tie and vassalage to china, and control the descent of the USD while other currencies and nations peak, then the logical conclusion is that the western half of the u.s. will become the next byzantium, while the eastern half, and the ozarks become the equivalent of afghanistan.

This arrangement also makes sense if you want to formally unseat DC, even as it assists in its own destruction. Move the capitol, and it has non of the defenses, or infrastructure necessary for government without massive investment. The old DC then becomes the "religious" center of power, with the new 'religion' being "patriotism" or "americanism" and we burn ourselves out in a two front war: one against the occupied west, and one internally against "terrorists" (actual americans and patriots). And the old DC will be allowed to continue in its withered, neutered state, because despite its appeals to "taking back america" and red-dawn style manifest destiny, its function will be to burn out whatever remains of any resistance to the occupation in the west of the CONUS, thereby preventing the scattered eastern states and blocs from coalescing into a credible threat.

If an alternative to the slow-change-to-totalitarianism is desired, this is how I would do a take over of the u.s. if a takeover is in the cards. I see no reason why this isn't their plan to begin with.