Normally I would agree with you, as I think that happens too often around here, but this was reported in the main stream press.
Couple reasons why I think this could actually be true, in addition to the fact that there WAS a fire:
1) Snopes came out and denied it.
2) CNN did a story on the fire (as in "the deed is done")
3) As pointed out, where was the sprinkler system? No way would you have an operation like that without a sprinkler system. Would insurance even pay that?
4) The fact that this story involves ballots shredded for chicken nesting? Who the heck would think of that as a made up story? Stacks of ballots in a barn? Yes - that could be a made-up story - But something as specific as they were used for chicken nesting? That has a ring of truth to it.
I normally don't post things like this - but in this case I did bc I sincerely believe there could be something to it (and I also clearly labeled it as "unverified" - not like I was trying to mislead people)
I gotcha. Good points.
Why, thank you :-)
My brother, in that case you have more of a solid case than I first thought. I'm just frustrated at the distractions.
No problem - I get it. Like I said, I usually don't post speculations like that, but I did find this one compelling.
I'm just frustrated at the distractions.
100% - so am I. For example, I made several posts yesterday - Of those, the one I consider most important was the one by Corey's digs about obedience. That post was the least up-voted of all of them because it was a long article and what a lot of people would consider "boring." But the "boring" stuff is what's going to kills us because they slide it in while we're paying attention to other things.
Well then he shouldn't say it's unverified!
I said it was unverified bc I could not prove that the fire was intentionally set to destroy illegal ballots.
(post is archived)