Always unverified with y'all, it kills the reliability. Just post something once you can back it up.
Normally I would agree with you, as I think that happens too often around here, but this was reported in the main stream press.
Couple reasons why I think this could actually be true, in addition to the fact that there WAS a fire:
1) Snopes came out and denied it.
2) CNN did a story on the fire (as in "the deed is done")
3) As pointed out, where was the sprinkler system? No way would you have an operation like that without a sprinkler system. Would insurance even pay that?
4) The fact that this story involves ballots shredded for chicken nesting? Who the heck would think of that as a made up story? Stacks of ballots in a barn? Yes - that could be a made-up story - But something as specific as they were used for chicken nesting? That has a ring of truth to it.
I normally don't post things like this - but in this case I did bc I sincerely believe there could be something to it (and I also clearly labeled it as "unverified" - not like I was trying to mislead people)
I gotcha. Good points.
My brother, in that case you have more of a solid case than I first thought. I'm just frustrated at the distractions.
Well then he shouldn't say it's unverified!
I said it was unverified bc I could not prove that the fire was intentionally set to destroy illegal ballots.
(post is archived)