Why would someone not be allowed to disapprove of something like this because they understand or enjoy Q or what they've done? These shallow ploys, attempting to play gotcha and maneuver people out of their positions, will never work. The difference between someone like me and someone like you is that most of the thought I have, I can articulate with great detail and answer a lot of logical steps to arrive at my ideas. They aren't founded on fleeting emotion or based on some shallow understanding of the topics I discuss. If I don't know much about something, I remain indifferent until something impresses me or seems out of place. Most people that aren't fond of "Q-anons" (we're just "anons" and we always have been) only hold those feelings out of ignorance, feigned contempt someone else has impressed upon them or baited emotional states conjured by people trying their hardest to get you to ignore us because [impeding] our ideas [from] circulating either offers them some kind of opportunity of gain or because they themselves will see ramifications.
(post is archived)