Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts (edited )

Red October comes to mind. Like when the Captain (Connery) turned into the torpedo to disarm it.

Trump knew there was no way he could go against the vaccines. It had to be this way. It's a war people.

They were planning on locking us up for 5 - 12 years Trump said.

This is all to expose big pharma, who have taken over the world.

This will destroy the medical industrial complex.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

I listen to Dave every day. X22 is great. However, Trump on Tour with Bill O'Rielly telling people to take the shot is TOTAL BULLSHIT.

Sorry, I like the guy and have stood the course.

This crosses the line.

HE IS ADVOCATING THE JAB FOR . . .

THE UNBORN, INFANTS, CHILDREN AND MOTHERS.

FUCK YOU TO ANYBODY THAT ADVOCATES OR ADMINISTERS THE JAB.

[–] • 2 pts

Dave is spot on with this one. I know it sucks not to have Trump reaffirm what we all know. You can tell that he does not like it as well. And he always quickly adds that it must be your own choice. This part of the strategy. We are at war. Make sure every one on our side is informed.

[–] • 1 pt

Agreed. It's funny to see how many here had the reaction they did.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

I'm going with GE's take:

We never would have been locked down for years. Lies. Americans would have revolted within the first 6 months. This whole talk that we need operation genocide to prevent lockdowns is a weak and pathetic excuse with no logical reasoning whatsoever. No virus was ever isolated. To perpetuate the narrative further is part of the problem altogether. There are no safe vaccines. Period. Anyone pushing poison cannot be trusted.

Besides, they're doing lockdowns and masks again. Doh!

[–] • 1 pt

Even the audience disagrees with Trump and O'reilly on the so called "vaccine". Weak applause after Trump said "do you agree with that?" The point is it's not a vaccine. SO how does the vaccine stop 100 million people from dying? If there is no "vaccine" then doctors are forced to find another way to cure this and they did. Ivermectin, HCQ and a host of vitamins especially Zinc.

I love Trump but no one has convinced me of the point that Dave at X22 is making. If that is really the reason for pushing Warp Speed then it was a poor decision in my mind.

[–] • 2 pts

If people were locked down for 5+ years like it was in the beginning, it would have tragic effects on everything.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

f people were locked down for 5+ years like it was in the beginning, it would have tragic effects on everything.

You are correct "IF". This is where decisions are made. Trump did a weak support of HCQ and Ivermectin. He never had any of the doctors or experts from around the world at the White House. He was making decisions based on what his echo chamber was telling him.

Would you stay locked down for more than a week? Me either and I didn't. The entire CDC, NIH and NIAID would have been exposed along with the FDA and the Pharma industry as being ineffective at least and complicit at worse.

IMO this will be Trump's Achilles heal. He is now part of the crime imo. I don't know how you get away from that fact. He pushed the deadly shot through Warp Speed and is promoting it along with O'reilly this week.

Ephesians 5:11 “And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.”

[–] • 2 pts

That;s not true that Trump was weak on HCQ and therapeutics. Peter Navarro said their main focus was flooding the market with therapeutics, which was stymied by Fauci and the CDC and all the other dick heads. The vaccines were not the main focus of Operation Warp Speed.

[–] • 1 pt

Trump pushed for a vaccine to counter the years long global lockdown that was planned. You have to choose the lesser of two evils. He hoped the vaccine makers would actually make a vaccine. Of course, the deep state countered his counter and made the vaccines their eugenics experiment.

People keep saying that Trump knows the adverse side effects, but you know what, so do the media and deep state. My theory is that after a while, the media is going to start reporting on these adverse reactions the closer it gets to Trump possibly running for office. They have to report on it sooner or later, people are hearing about adverse reactions too much as it is.

But, they are going to keep encouraging people to get it, and hiding it for the time being. But one day, it's gonna be "all Trump's fault" the media will cry, "he rushed the production and maimed and killed millions of people because of it". This is their strategy to keep him from ever being in office again.

If he tells his millions and millions of supporters to not get it, he is immediately fucked, "HE'S CARELESSLY KILLING MILLIONS OF PEOPLE HURR DURR!!!!" they'll cry. Or at that point all the adverse reactions are magically reported by the media and "HE CREATED THE VACCINE TO KILL HIS OPPOSITION!!! TRUMP SUPPORTERS ARE ANTI-VAXXERS AND HE KNEW THEY WOULDN'T TAKE IT HURR DURR!!!

It's just another twist in the movie if you ask me, but who knows, maybe Trump is one of them. Q did say the ending won't be for everyone.

[–] • 0 pt

Trump did a weak support of HCQ and Ivermectin. He never had any of the doctors or experts from around the world at the White House. He was making decisions based on what his echo chamber was telling him.

You don't know that. You aren't considering the complexities of the situation and how the DS would have reacted if he had pushed the cures harder. He had to balance the situation, knowing that pushing too hard would have caused worse reactions. Assassinations, supply shortages, heavier MSM lies, any number of distractions/reactions that we know nothing about but he does.

This whole idea of him being limited to an echo chamber is nonsense, IMO. Who is in this echo chamber? The people that many think were stabbing him in the back based on rumors, personal opinions, incorrect interpretations of their statements and actions, purposeful optics, etc.?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

SO how does the vaccine stop 100 million people from dying? If there is no "vaccine" then doctors are forced to find another way to cure this and they did.

You aren't considering the earlier part of his statement. They planned a slow roll-out of the vaccines after a long period of time while the country/world was destroyed in other ways. They needed that time to make deadlier vaccines than they were able to because of Warp Speed. The DS had no intention of allowing these virus cures to come out at all. Trump promoted them early on to give people the heads up. If the DS's plans had been carried out on their own time-line, it would have caused the 100 million or more deaths.

He knew their plans. He countered them by forcing a rapid vaccine roll-out. The DS wasn't prepared to create a vaccine so quickly that would have been worse than what they produced. Even the virus wasn't as ready as they had hoped. Remember that there were Chinese whistleblowers from Wuhan in the US a year or more before the virus was released. The virus was released at a very suspicious time (when they saw that they couldn't impeach Trump and had no other recourse), and it wasn't nearly as deadly as the DS expected. I don't doubt for a minute that the release was initiated by white hats in order to force the DS to follow through with their plans when they weren't really ready to.

[–] • 0 pt

You aren't considering the earlier part of his statement. They planned a slow roll-out of the vaccines after a long period of time while the country/world was destroyed in other ways.

I am aware of this just like the next person. I wouldn't let one person die on my watch without fighting the enemy with every tool I had. If I had to get on TV every night and disrupt the nightly lies, I mean news, I would do it. But that's me and my values speaking. The fact of the matter is we are trusting the very people that created this cluster fck of a government and it's my opinion that taking the enemy straight on and fast (like Patton) is the best way to defeat an enemy.

[–] • 0 pt

I wouldn't let one person die on my watch without fighting the enemy with every tool I had.

There has been a war against him since the day he announced he was running for office. In war, you have to make small sacrifices in order to avoid larger ones. You can pretend that you could have done better all you want. That doesn't mean you would have been able to.

If I had to get on TV every night and disrupt the nightly lies, I mean news, I would do it.

You forget that Trump had no means to get on TV every night. He could have maybe forced them to play his speeches, but then they would have found ways to sabotage that, whether by taking down the communications grid or by distractions like terrorism or another outbreak or an attack by China or whatever else they might cook up. Remember: he knew/knows what they are capable of and he has had to handle things very carefully. As far as the pandemic, he was making daily news conferences from the day it started. He was informing the people on how to deal with it. He told us about the cures. He knew the numbers were being rigged to make it look worse than it was. He knew that they were planning to make it worse but needed time to develop their poisons. He fast-tracked it so as to undermine that. Now people blame him for the fact that he allowed vaccines at all. Some people just don't get it that he did the best thing he could under the circumstances.

The fact of the matter is we are trusting the very people that created this cluster fck of a government

The people who created it have come and gone. What you're dealing with today are the agents of the DS who have been put in place mostly through illegal means. The system has been rigged for a long time. To say you trust them is to say you don't understand that. You have had no choice all along.

taking the enemy straight on and fast (like Patton) is the best way to defeat an enemy.

Trump started out in office with a very small group of people he knew he could trust. He had to develop a larger group very carefully. He couldn't chance taking on the entire global DS network straight on and fast. Patton knew the limits of his enemies and the arena he was fighting in and his situation was in no way as complex as what Trump's has been. It's easy to think that it would be so simple, but the two situations don't compare. The enemy wasn't as large and powerful and organized when Patton went to war. He didn't have a large MSM army on his back to turn the people he was fighting for against him. This is why Q was so very important. Trump had to approach the situation very carefully and build trust and support while battling against the strong efforts he knew they would make to undermine him. He had to deal with things on their schedule at first, and use that time to allow the people to see that there was a DS, who they were, and what they were like. You can't say he didn't open your eyes to the real size of them and their vast power and organization. And you can't expect that he knew himself exactly who he was up against early on, although he had a much better idea than the rest of us, and he was able to use his backchannels to develop a better understanding while also developing allies while he fought the constant attacks against him in his first term.