The definition of experimental:
based on untested ideas or techniques and not yet established or finalized
I think it is wrong to refer to mRNA as experimental. mRNA has been used on humans and has been tested for over a decade. It has has performed consistently over all of the previous testing. The results of the testing has always been failure. This is not an experiment because all previous evidence shows the same expected outcome. This is why the FDA won't release details of the drug trails. This is why the CDC sets up convoluted tests to "prove" efficacy.
The mRNA vax is guaranteed to do more harm than good. They know this and are trying to obfuscate it. Proving efficacy would be as simple as tracking all cause mortality immediately after the first shot and comparing it with unvaxxed individuals. They won't do this very simple and revealing study because they already know the result.
This is only partially true as mRNA uses nanolipid shell technology to deliver the synthetic mRNA into cells which has been done in the past, however, modifying messenger RNA to turn your body into an S protein factory has never been done to humans so this iteration is in fact an experiment.
In this case it is apparent that the cure is worse than the disease but half the human population didn't need to participate in this experiment in order to find that out.
(post is archived)