Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

650

OK, I realize this is coming from her competitor. I realize this is relatively not a lot of money. I also realize that she gave the money to a company who invested it for her.

That being said. It IS hypocritical coming from Greene, unethical, and should be illegal for ANY member of Congress to hold stock in companies when Congress is legislating laws that potentially affect the price of that stock and/or regulations surrounding the company. Period.

I realize this will be an unpopular post, but we have to look at the truth even when we don't like it.

OK, I realize this is coming from her competitor. I realize this is relatively not a lot of money. I also realize that she gave the money to a company who invested it for her. That being said. It IS hypocritical coming from Greene, unethical, and should be illegal for ANY member of Congress to hold stock in companies when Congress is legislating laws that potentially affect the price of that stock and/or regulations surrounding the company. Period. I realize this will be an unpopular post, but we have to look at the truth even when we don't like it.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 5 pts (edited )

She's probably controlled opp. Carlson's a commie too, they all are.

People like this act as a safety valve to avoid violence. People think they don't have to do anything because Marjorie Taylor Green (ever wonder why all three names? lol) is in there.

It's like telling someone, "Your complaints are being heard and looked into. We're just as perplexed about this as you are.", meanwhile, they are laughing at you.

Once you realize what they want to avoid, then you know how to fix it.

Why do you think they're so hot to get rid of the 2nd and why every other Western nation has already been disarmed?

[–] • 1 pt

Good points.

So sick of the grifters

[–] • 1 pt

Yep , exactly. 'Lol, I'm against kikes but i'll invest in the kike fund bagels-r-us. Cause everyone loves a bagel, am i rite ??.' I'm anti war but i'll invest in Fiat Corporation - who coincidently still manufacture land mines for the open market - or Gunthrop or Darpa etc. It's hypocritical to claim to be against A but also invest in A because it will furnish them big shekels. She should invest in Food for Goys or something...

[–] • 0 pt

Everyone holding an investment portfolio is controlled op.

Lol. bwahahahahaha... bwahahahahaha...

Ya, we see you.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

You can't see anything.

You're a retard, trying to make empty threats to scare people.

No one is afraid of you. lol

[–] • 0 pt

Lol. bwahahahahaha... bwahahahahaha...

Ya, we see you.

[–] • 4 pts

She's allowed to invest whatever money she has and she didn't do it herself.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Yes, as I clearly stated in the text portion of my post.

However, given her extremely outspoken stance on the jab, it does come off as hypocritical.

[–] • 1 pt

All traded companies are owed by two companies. With your standard, if you invest on wallstreet you are hypocritical.

[–] • 2 pts

Exactly. You can't blame her good trying to build a retirement. People on the right always looking for someone without any blemishes.

[–] • 0 pt

Nothing would make me invest money in something to which I was adamantly opposed and that was profiting from harming people. Nothing.

She knew about it since she put it on her financial disclosure form.

[–] • 0 pt

She's trying to get the injection hoax shutdown, so I would argue she's doing the opposite of trying to enrich herself.

[–] • 1 pt

It is almost as if, now stay with me here, all of these commie kike faggots are on the same fucking side. How much evidence do you need? Neither side is good. Both sides are cucked.

[–] • 2 pts

100%. One big uniparty - and until we learn to ID these people, we're going to kepp voting them into office.

[–] • 1 pt

Wow, shocking if true.

[–] • 5 pts

Not really. She has an investment broker. They invest to profit. They wisely invested, as they are required to do.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

Pfizer owns Purell. JnJ produces more than just their vaccine, and AZ doesn't even have a vaccine on market in the United States. In addition to being wise investments, they are also timely considering the demand for the time we live in.

[–] • 1 pt

Exactly. Now notice all of the dog piling based on absolutely nothing. On a post designed for consensus cracking. Notice the inorganic up vote and dog piling based on nothing but stupidity. Yet they still reach harsh, absolute, understandings. All universally shared and reinforced with various accounts and up votes.

Holidays are when shills push into overdrive to reinforce propaganda and discredit competing ideas and people. Because this is when people are chatting with larger groups and thinking out loud the most. Because of this, they care to sow FUD (Fear Uncertainty Doubt) as much as possible. Which also doubles as consensus cracking.

Amazing amount of propaganda all here in this one post.

[–] • 1 pt

Yes - grieved my heart to see it, given that she's one of the loudest voices out there against the jab. It just doesn't look good no matter how you slice it.

[–] • 1 pt

downvotes are for spam or off topic posts. Please only use it for that purpose.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

this shit is spam.

[–] • 0 pt

I get it. But nonetheless

[–] • 1 pt

Dude, you don't have to try and save face so much with all those prefaces.

She's doing shitty hypocritical things. Call her out.

If I espoused the majesty and awesomeness of Islam but ate bacon, you better call me out even if you're Muslim and love the preaching I do.

How is that different, here? Hold each other accountable.

[–] • 1 pt

Why thank you. I agree she needs called out which is why I posted this. My comments are not so much about saving face as they are about saving time - writing the disclaimers once and hoping it heads off the anticipated rationalizations. I agree with you - the truth is the truth and no rationalizations needed.

[–] • 1 pt

My comments are not so much about saving face as they are about saving time - writing the disclaimers once and hoping it heads off the anticipated rationalizations.

I know exactly what you mean. My bad. Yeah, even the folks around here are not above emotional kneejerk reactions and tantrums.

[–] • 1 pt

Lots of people don't like Greene and they may turn out to be right..

[–] • 0 pt

Will be interesting to see whether she makes a statement about this.

Her Rep. opponent def needs vetted.

[–] • 1 pt

The louder they are the more they have to hide.

[–] • 1 pt

Gotta get those gibs. She has golden donors, been cucked. She's our flavor though.

[–] • 0 pt

How is just she top 3 anti semite while profits heavily off 3 vaxx

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

uh oh. i smell something fishy with this post.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

You are peddling smut for her opponent. here, just read this comment again, it hits all the right spots. i am fucking sick of you civnat asses.

"Exactly. Now notice all of the dog piling based on absolutely nothing. On a post designed for consensus cracking. Notice the inorganic up vote and dog piling based on nothing but stupidity. Yet they still reach harsh, absolute, understandings. All universally shared and reinforced with various accounts and up votes.

Holidays are when shills push into overdrive to reinforce propaganda and discredit competing ideas and people. Because this is when people are chatting with larger groups and thinking out loud the most. Because of this, they care to sow FUD (Fear Uncertainty Doubt) as much as possible. Which also doubles as consensus cracking.

Amazing amount of propaganda all here in this one post."

and this one:

"Not really. She has an investment broker. They invest to profit. They wisely invested, as they are required to do. "