There's a lot to be gleaned about what the corporate media reports upon. I gave you an example, but you're quick to invalidate it because using "no one trusts the media" is, in your mind, a rigid assertion, where no alternative ideas can be gathered other than the obvious - that the media is liars. Well, I agree and I think them saying negative things about things they don't like says just as much as what they don't report on or dramatize. This is an odd hill to die on though... Either way, this whole running in circles thing is boring.
Oh yes, now comes all your speculation bound up as fact .. Plus, Never said nor did i infer 'no one trusts the media'. That assertion is in your mind not mine, yet you trust it enough to source it as an answer - sounds like confirmation bias without due diligence. I mean you did check other sources to counter that 'parents are WN'S and q-followers ' narrative didn't you??. I mean are you really agreeing with these 'plenty of reports' that these parents are White Nationalist's . What happened to 'question everything for validity' ??. Why use false equivalency and rhetoric as a pass for a measure of truth ??. Took you long enough to realise your bored. I was bored at your first reply.
(post is archived)