@NoisySilence and @Redblade, disliking the article doesn't make it spam or off-topic. People are allowed to criticize Trump, even from trashy outlets.
>WELCOME TO QSTORM
>This is a Pro-Q, Pro-Trump sub for research and news regarding both.
>RULES FOR SUBMITTING POSTS
>*No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing.
Bashing doesn't equal all criticism. There used to be a sticky post up for ages talking about said difference.
I added "Free debate is allowed and encouraged as long as it is civil" to "No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing" to go along with the rule and clarification in the previous rule post. The rule distinguishes between good faith criticism and constructive criticism against bad faith criticism, destructive criticism and ad hominem, hence why "bashing" is what the rule is against and not merely anti-Q or anti-Trump posts generally.
After seeing his other post, "Trump Partying With His Pedophile Friends," I didn't look for the fine nuance in this other post by someone who calls himself "hitler_was_right." It's good to know we have a moderator who knows the fine points about the right and wrong way to bash Trump.
(post is archived)