WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

495

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

This won't be the most popular thing I say but Assange is a traitor. Traitor to humanity. When Trump said he'd execute Assange I thought that was telling especially since Yahoo reports that Trump hates Assange because Assange knows "foreign powers helped elect Trump". That's funny because a bevy of Russian's marched in and out of that embassy and wrote it down on a log.

A couple of things that ALWAYS stand out to me about Assange.

First. Bradley Manning's father worked for the Office of Naval Intelligence. (Brian had joined the United States Navy in 1974, at the age of 19, and served for five years as an intelligence analyst.) From the shills at wikipedia. Supposedly he worked IT for Hertz later but that was extremely weird. Read up about his family.

I always recommend reading the ridiculous wiki page on Manning. Here was a person who fucked things up CONSTANTLY in the military, was referred for discharge, had it rescinded over and over, was traveling to other countries and NO ONE thought that odd. I think any of us who've known people in the military know that is extremely uncommon.

Crowdstrike is CIA and wikileaks most likely, especially now. Remember when Assange's lawyer sleepwalked from his townhouse down into the subway and walked in front of an oncoming train? I do. And I thought it extremely suspicious then.

Don't even get me started on Lamo or the fact that the the Washington Post and NYTimes broke the stories.

So this guy desperately trying to get out of the military, the one who can barely stay out of the fetal position, suddenly balls up and decides he's gonna be a hero. B.U.L.L.S.H.I.T. Manning was an asset from the beginning. Obama's pardon was a clear nod.

Then, on shitbook I accepted a friend request and that guy happened to be the boyfriend of the girl who was best friends with the girl accusing Assange. Really? Really? I mean, what are the fucking odds. Bullshit, again.

Also, there are tunnels under London. There are tunnels under the embassys and the monarchy's buildings. Those tunnels run under the embassy Assange was in. He moved freely whether anyone wants to admit it or not. The entire thing was a ruse. You will never be able to confirm this online. I met someone years ago, much older, who knew about the tunnels from wartime in London. I can't prove it but it is compelling and if you tell me there are no tunnels under Buckingham I will laugh.

Assange is sitting pretty until Trump. Then things get bumpy.

This has always been super curious to me. November 2018: A U.S. court filing that appears to inadvertently reveal the existence of a sealed criminal case against Assange is discovered by a researcher. No details are confirmed.

Literally everyone connected to Assange is dead (Lamo) or a proven C_A assent (Snowden).

I spent a lot of time wondering if Assange is legit, a useful idiot or an asset. He's an asset. Period.

Remember when Snowden released Sha hastags relating to Assange? I do. Then they were bullshit. Yeah, I remember that, too. Also remember that Snowden has been sitting pretty in Russia Russia Russia for close to a decade. Really? And that isn't suspicious to anyone.

I am very curious to see what happens with this extradition. There is a chance he tried to save his ass and will be useful but I wouldn't trust Assange to clean a toilet.

My opinion.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Thanks for the interesting post. You definitely spent some time thinking on this. For me, I can't understand how an asset would reveal Hillary's emails. No bigger connected person than her. IMO Assange proves there is a global cabal running things but then I would think he would have been knocked off by now if he had any damning info.

You are correct about tunnels all over London. That is how Londoners survived the NAZI bombings. When I was there I was surprised at deep some of them are. Very deep, 100's of feet.

Snowden was mentioned in a Q drop. I got the impression that he was an asset that was supposed to take down one or more of the "other" intelligence agencies so the Clowns would be on top. He has apparently lived well in Russia for a long time.

Didn't know that all those people connected to Assange are dead now. Clintoncide?

Assange looked pretty deathly when they took him ouut of the embassy. If he were an asset he'd be looking a lot better imo.

[–] 1 pt

Okay. Here are my thoughts on the emails. They weren't sensational. They were illegal. It is not legal to communicate like that IF you have a clearance and everyone who has a clearance knows it. But she got out of it. Nothing Assange has ever said or did turned out to be sensational beyond the fact that he released the collateral damage videos. But here's the thing, look at everyone around him. Everyone. He's the luckiest useful idiot or an asset. Everyone else is dead except Manning and Manning is so broken I wouldn't know where to start. The Pamela Anderson visit really gave him away. He could have refused. Everyone tied to Heffner was or is an asset and that is real whether people want to admit it or not.

So you're thinking, so what? Hear me out. When 2016 rolled around I thought Trump was a straw man. Period. I had a few friends who really liked him but I could not be swayed. Straw man. Yawn. But he worried me because I did not want the Clintons. So I kept a close eye on him. Through a series of events too long for a brief reply I ended up 50 minutes away from one of his speaking events. I went. Trump said and did things that stood out. My opinion of Trump changed over time for very specific reasons. What does this have to do with Assange?

Because Assange had dead man switches and files and everything else. Any man smart enough to stay alive would have been smart enough to drop the hammer. AND IF HE WAS REALLY stuck in an embassy he had nothing to lose. He would have known that. I truly believe he was there to prop up a narrative. It is the whole concept of the people in office tell you what they are doing so they can get away with it in broad daylight. The concept of collateral damage has always existed. The news needed ratings and people hated Bush and badda bing, there is your talking point for three years. You know how I really know it was bullshit, They made a movie about it with Helen Mirren, I have so much info Assange it's like PODedPatriot with Omidyar.

If Assange made a deal to tell the truth then we'll see but he had more Russians going in and out of that Embassy than anyone. For the record, I think this is all show and I am putting my money on someone pulling a Jack Ruby as soon as he is stateside. We'll see,

The Q drops about Snowden gave me the impression he was being hunted. That photo Q posted linked the people helping Snowden to pedos. Damning for sure. My opinion of those drops was: WE SEE YOU AND WE KNOW. But that is open to interpretation. Obviously.

There were also drops naming Snowden and the ES drops. Everyone took the ES drops as Snowden but I thought it was Eric Schmidt. So that.

Also I say this to people all of the time. You go and steal national secrets, dump them to media paid by globalists and go live in an enemy country and then see if they let your girlfriend join you six months later. Delusional. THAT would never happen. Real world, she is held indefinitely under the Patriot Act at an undisclosed location until she simply goes away.

Assange yelled and fought leaving the embassy then sat quietly smiling in the transport. I dunno. My money is on he either tells the world something really useful or he gets Jack Ruby'd. We'll see.

Clintonside? Maybe? I've thought about that but I don't get the impression it was the Clintons. Whoever bankrolled Assange was the one he reported too. Everyone around him died. That is extremely suspicious. Almost like they knew too much and told him and he told someone and bye bye. These fights for power aren't us versus them. It's like there are factions of people fighting for power and honestly for as crazy as he seemed Phil Schneider did an excellent job describing it.

Then, Ecuador. Really? Of all embassies. The one where Father Crespi amassed his collection and Neil Armstrong went into caves looking for ancient civilizations. Ecuador always stood out to me as odd. The corruption, the secrecy, the history. I personally liked it when they asked the head of the embassy who he'd vote for if he could and he said, "Clinton." When people tell you who they are, believe them. Hard lesson for most people.

I'm not saying I'm right but I am saying there is every reason to never trust Assange. I think we've all learned that headlines aren't made, they are bankrolled and when media outlets don't want to run the truth (which is always) they don't. Makes a high profile media darling like Assange look very, very suspicious.

[–] 0 pt

I have so much info Assange it's like PO'DPatriot with Omidyar.

I have no doubt about it but be patient as people need to digest what you reveal. It's not that we don't believe you or POdPatriot it's that your level of knowledge is far above everyone else.

I am very interested in what you think of Assange especially as it appears to be coming to a corrupt court near us.

I'll tell you what I tell PO'dPatriot. Keep spreading the truth and people will come around. Everyone seems to have someone or something that really gets their goat and they study the heck out of it. That's why we are all here. To share the truth and our research / thoughs.

[–] 0 pt

Here, let me say this. I believed every lie out of Assange's mouth UNTIL Obama pardoned Manning. They always pardon their dumb comrades. So I looked into Manning. Here's my challenge, go to Manning's wikipedia page and read about him and then come back and tell me this whole thing is legit. I have had friends who went way less loco than Manning and got their asses kicked to the curb fast in the military. The media paints the military as full of tards and trannies. Whatever, one of my closet friends just retired as a drill sergeant. There is literally no way, unless Manning was an asset that he was allowed to stay in. No way. Manning is an asset.Lamo was an asset or a now dead useful idiot. Once you question Manning and Lamo you're gonna start questioning more and some pieces that seemed odd will fall into place.

Schneider basically said there are wars going on with otherworldly beings and we are all pawns caught in the crossfire. He sounds batshit crazy when he says it but it sure explains a lot. What I liked about Q was that that was highlighted. This is a war and we are all pawns until we become PLAYERS. Pawns are useful idiots. Players are way more challenging. I never saw Q as saying someone is gonna save us. I saw Q saying get off the sidelines and get in this war to win it. But that's me.

Know what happens to real journalists? The end up dead. Hastings. Webb.

Also the fact that Assange just happened to be from one of the most corrupt countries and a five eyes always seemed coincidental. But look into it. I see you on here a lot and I think you're on here to find the truth and not just lies that make you comfortable. This is all my opinion. I'd be curious to see what you think.

[–] 0 pt

The manning thing is very suspicious. I agree with you that Obummer pardoning him certainly makes him look like a protected asset. He's obviously a traitor to his team so pardoning him is aiding and abetting traitors at the very least.

Considering Obummers ties with Satanic people it could also be just another war against God and His Word. Everything the left pushes goes against God's Word. Coincidence? There are no coincidences imo.

How is Manning tied to Assange?