Manning gave Assange the docs.
Here is a great article about Lamo. It's super short and doesn't go into all of the details but read those "messages" from Manning to Lamo. Very curious.
I have a friend who is retired Army Intelligence. He is one of the most decent, devoted people I've ever met. I always heckled him to tell me something good. No deal. He wouldn't budge. So one time I said, "Okay answer me this. Do you see a stream of shit that is classified and boring or do you see really cool shit?" His answer, "I see really cool shit."
So when all this happened I asked him what he thought. His answer, "No one is more heavily monitored than intelligence. Manning would have known that. Period. Transmissions are READ and filtered BEFORE leaving the server. Those messages would have never reached Lamo or Assange.
And the truth is, come on, you know that. I know that. We all know that. But... the narrative screams loud.
I am here to find the truth. I get it. There's a learning curve and sometimes people need to do a lot of research. No pressure. I am not being contentious. If you do look into it I would be curious to hear your response. Most people resist this info.
You are certainly on to something. One thing that bothers me is how did Lamo not get a job after that NYTimes hack? All the intel agencies want people like that. Heck, Corporations want people with that technical skill. Something is off there.
Exactly. Instead he was booed and demonized. Hackers hated him. They still hate him. If you bring Lamo up they launch into Lamo was a sell out working with the Feds long before Manning. Every. Single. Time. **Lamo was working with the Feds. ** Period. Ruminate on that a second. How did all of these hackers know he was a sell out long before Manning? Because it was a well established fact that Lamo was working with the feds. Manning was a fucking trainwreck who couldn't get out of the fetal position long enough to dress himself but was somehow calm, cool, collected enough to out collateral damage. Umm, okay. And then there is Assange. That blazing face of truth plastered EVERYWHERE. I think we've all learned that the NYT and Washington Post are 100 percent shills and what makes the front page is what they want you to see.
This article stands out as interesting to me. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/23/us/politics/assange-indictment.html
The article is pro Assange but more than that they don't take him to task for leaking classified docs to the press. Really? Why not? Oh, right because the NYT lives and dies for those leaks. Look at how favorably everyone treats Assange. And then pull up even a single article about OMG ORANGE MAN. There are literally right this minute headline articles that are hating on Trump right now on the MSN home page. But everyone is very worried about the first amendment and Assange but forgetting that Assange isn't protected under the first because he isn't an American. It's like living in a fairy tale. But the fact that Snowden has Assange's back AT EVERY TURN should be the biggest red flag. Free press my ass.
This is all so subtle. I realize that as I type. It is something I've been following for so long that I have a web of connections in my head. Ask me anything. Hopefully I'm making sense of this.
You make great sense. hen you study something long and deep enough you become like a divining rod for the subject. I'd take your word over the MSM or the gov't any day of the week. Would love to know how the hacker community knew Lamo was working with the Feds. Who leaked that? NYT? Washington Compost? The deceit is off the charts with the power brokers. Only Satan could deceive better.
(post is archived)