>that makes it obvious that Q is doing anything other than distracting you
This just proves my point that you are not in reality. Let me update you. Q basically went out of existence shortly after the stolen election. So Q is not "distracting" anybody. And Q never did anything (as far as can be determined) except communicate about things that were happening. Q wasn't doing those things. Just reporting them to us. You sound like one of those who believed that Q was some kind of secret agent on steroids who was going out and busting bad guys. And when you and your naive friends figured out that wasn't happening, instead of adjusting yourself to reality, you got all butthurt about it an started trashing Q. And now, apparently, you've mae it your mission. The anti-Q crusader!
I think you would do well to take some time off from the crusade, and start to educate yourself. Start by reading the constitution. By doing that you will hopefully learn how things are supposed to work, and you will begin to see how things are not working, and why, which are big clues as to why Trump couldn't just clap his hands together and make everything better.
Sooo, no? You can’t give any specific examples of how what Q said would happen has happened.
Right?
Everything that happened in N. Korea during Trump's term. When the media was freaking out that Kim was going to nuke American cities, we knew Trump had already made a deal. It was all there in the Q drops.
So, you’re saying that something NOT happening is proof that something happened?
How would you tell the difference between this situation and the media + Q completely making up a conflict with N Korea that never existed in the first place?
Nothing happening can never be proof that something is happening
(post is archived)