Using Lin Wood to automatically discredit Flynn is a cheap shot. >there really doesn’t seem to be a plan. You don't see that the DS has had a plan either? The DS had a plan, as we can now see very clearly, and there is enough evidence out now to show that they were planning this pandemic for years, and that China would play a significant part in it. Flynn was DNI under Obama, and would have known about the things we're only now hearing about after the fact, as well as things we don't know yet and may never know for national security reasons. Trump would also have been made aware of these things through Flynn and others, and would have developed a plan to counter theirs. You can pretend that things are simple and that what we the public know about what's going on is all there is to know about all of this, but that's not how things work. You can pretend that one person (Wood) who might be sleazy means that everyone who comes close to him is sleazy, but that's not a very good way to judge people. You can pretend that the phone call was secretly taped, but you have no evidence of that. Even sleazy people are useful at times. Trump knows this and so does Flynn. They also know that what they say in public causes others to think in certain terms, and they use this to their advantage. Flynn is trained in this. Trump is pretty damn good at it too, and they're both very careful about what they say and how they phrase it. You have to listen very carefully to what they say and know why they might be saying it in order to understand it's purpose. This clip was taken from a longer conversation so it may have been taken out of context, but in any case, Flynn is talking about the Qanon meme and not Q or the people that followed him, and so is Wood. Wood distinguishes this fact at the end of that conversation, but some clips that are going around now have removed that part. So it's always better to go the source and understand the context of a conversation and the possible reasons for it before laying judgment on what is said.