WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

993

I searched the word adrenochrome on my DuckDuckGo. Hit the news button and got nothing but Qanon news results. Anyone else use this search engine?

I searched the word adrenochrome on my DuckDuckGo. Hit the news button and got nothing but Qanon news results. Anyone else use this search engine?

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 6 pts

WTF isnt?

[+] [deleted] 4 pts
[–] 5 pts

Has been for years. Welcome to 2016, nigger retard.

[–] 0 pt

You are sooo charming. How do get by being so damn charming bro? s/

[–] 4 pts
[–] 0 pt

I use Brave. Not going to say it's not a honey pot too but I like it.

[–] 4 pts

Everything is compromised

[–] 2 pts

use brave search and searx instances

[–] 2 pts

EVERYTHING on the internet is compromised.

[–] 0 pt

I believe you are correct. We thought it was for us when it came out but it is for the rulers to keep track of us.

[–] 1 pt

The internet was a honey pot from day one.

[–] 2 pts

As much as they advertise that "what you search for at 3 am is safe with us", they are probably FBI trying to set you up

[–] 2 pts

I suspect you are correct. I won't use them anymore. I've suspected something was up with them for months now. Today just made it obvious to me.

[–] 2 pts

It was started by kikes.

[–] 1 pt

DuckDuckGo is about as reliable as a used condom.

[–] 0 pt

You had to use it to know that.

The condom, I mean.

[–] 0 pt

Uh-huh, and shooting yourself is the only way to find out if a gun will kill you.

[–] 1 pt

It makes sense that the only "news" results you got were from Q sites bc the mainstream news is not talking about adrenochrome.

That being said, (and although I DO use DDG,) everything on the internet is compromised.

[–] 1 pt

I recall there being a lot of articles on andrenochrome a year or so ago. I might be mistaken.

[–] 1 pt

You're right - there was a lot about it - but IIRC only on alt sites

It’s safer to assume that everyone is. Why we wouldn’t at this point escapes me.

Load more (2 replies)