Do you really think if the shit was safe and effective that congress would excuse themselves from the mandate? The companies have zero liability. And also covid has an extremely small mortality rate. It literally kills the same category of people the flu kills every year.
Also, spike proteins are what makes rona deadly and the shot causes your body to make them. It effects the endothelial lining of your vascular system. It contains 7 segments of HIV. It's made to self replicate. You don't want a robust antibody response for a long time because antibodies are only present during infection. You want a Tcell response. Unfortunately the more shots taken the worse it is. The immune system will function at 1/6 th of what it was. It's sad.
OR, you could just be familiar with law to understand why Biden cannot force any executive orders on Congress or their Staff instead of some hairbrained conspiracy theory:
The companies have zero liability.
Wrong. I debunked this ages ago. They do have liability. And the "immunity" from liability has existed since 1988:
42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22, "No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings."
But it doesn't end there. There is a liability fund for these emergency authorization vaccines:
"PREP Act also created the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), which provides benefits to people who claim that they suffered injuries from vaccines under emergency authorization."
There's also a gross negligence liability that all the manufacturers are still beholden to. If an exec or a researcher communicated in any traceable way that the vaccines did bad thing x, y, or z, and they tried to cover it up, and someone got hurt, they can still be sued for gross negligence. The problem is: there's likely nothing they did not document or acknowledge in their side-effects and no exec is going to be retarded enough to put in writing, "We know this vaccine kills people but let's hide this in the research and publish it anyway to get FDA approval." This is the argument people like you are making and it's not true at all.
And also covid has an extremely small mortality rate. It literally kills the same category of people the flu kills every year.
Factually wrong. COVID-19 kills far more people each year, these last 2 years (world-wide), compared to the Flu:
https://www.who.int/news/item/11-03-2019-who-launches-new-global-influenza-strategy
NB4 "overcounting deaths." According to the deaths for all causes, we are likely undertracking COVID-19 deaths in the US. The UK is likely overtracking.
Explain the 64k of excess deaths not due to covid... Be happy with your decision in taking an experimental gene therapy but don't go spreading misinformation.
Be happy with your decision in taking an experimental gene therapy
Can you imagine how retarded someone has to be to call an mRNA vaccine a "DNA Editing drug"? Wheeeeew, that's pretty super retard cringe.
Except cvnt all nations not just usa waived liability and some obscure law in just the usa doesn't mean that it can be enforced.
Given the fact these drugs have killed America. Name one case CUNT that has been successfully brought to court.
Given the fact these drugs have killed America.
Imagine being this much of a pathetic loser. "boo hoo, America is dead because...because...some vaccines were made that saved lives n'stuff. waaaah"
Debunked this retarded talking point, as well.
The antivax tards tried to say that "31,000 people died last month in the UK!!!" In reality, the average before the COVID-19 bullshit was 35,000.
Any time you see that retarded talking point, look at the death rates per 100K or per year (this will require you to do some math...might be hard for most people thinking these talking points are anything close to legit) 2019 and before. Then compare it to the hairbrained article. If the death rates are still not higher or are within 1 standard deviation, you know that author is a fucking retard.
You glow!
(He posted something that clearly proves we believed stupid shit. Either we're wrong or I can handwa\ve it as him being a dirty filthy Jew. Hmmm...which one should I chose? Admit I've been wrong for years about this stuff or just call him a Jew?)
Okay, retard.
(post is archived)