Have you noticed how quietly they have been arresting traitors responsible for the Big Steal in AZ? Of course you have not, it aint happening!

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (89).

[–] • 0 pt

The country has been gradually getting worse for decades. At some point, the hope is that people would do something about it.

So you agree then that it's not fair to blame a movement that's been alive for a mere four years for this kind of development, right?

But the catalyst meant nothing because 80% of the people who would have done something were trusting the plan

Why can we not let things play out in court? Why can we not use the cycle as an opportunity to reshape the American peoples' ideas as they relate to current political climates? It's foolish to jump right to burning everything down when we just got Trump in office. No one expected him to win, man. He did it anyway. Clearly there's some hope if something like that is allowed to happen. Until this keeps happening, I'm content with letting people figure out how to maneuver around this circumstance and think "just burn it down!" when one hiccup comes up is way too quick to act.

You view Q as our savior while Q allowed a takeover of our government, and nobody did anything about it because they were trusting Q

This is such a flagrant mischaracterization of what's unfolding. Not only is that such a retarded summation, you're the one sprinting off in to multiple conversations. Don't give me this bullshit about non sequiturs either. I'm not just content with running in circles while you strawman over and over and continuously present your inability to even reference Q while making bold and misleading characterizations.

Saying "nobody did anything about it because they were trusting Q" is retarded and I think you know that. Q encouraged everyone to do their own research and think for themselves. You can't even point to who Q is. How are you going to blame an amorphous placeholder name for "guy that said some things on the internet once" for making everyone not riot like you wanted? You keep making this circular argument where you blame the audience because they listened to Q. That makes no sense. People can act or not based on their own volition. I think what you're really upset about is someone moralized normalfags and they didn't have egregious reactions to things you're not satisfied with.

You keep bring up how Q did things they didn't do. It was the average Norman who "decided not to riot". You've no reason to blame Q for any of that. All it was doing was disseminating information. Even then, coaxing the populace to doing a revolution because you're bummed things didn't go your way is selfish and retarded.

>The country has been gradually getting worse for decades. At some point, the hope is that people would do something about it. So you agree then that it's not fair to blame a movement that's been alive for a mere four years for this kind of development, right? >But the catalyst meant nothing because 80% of the people who would have done something were trusting the plan Why can we not let things play out in court? Why can we not use the cycle as an opportunity to reshape the American peoples' ideas as they relate to current political climates? It's foolish to jump right to burning everything down when we just got Trump in office. No one expected him to win, man. He did it anyway. Clearly there's some hope if something like that is allowed to happen. Until this keeps happening, I'm content with letting people figure out how to maneuver around this circumstance and think "just burn it down!" when one hiccup comes up is way too quick to act. >You view Q as our savior while Q allowed a takeover of our government, and nobody did anything about it because they were trusting Q This is such a flagrant mischaracterization of what's unfolding. Not only is that such a retarded summation, you're the one sprinting off in to multiple conversations. Don't give me this bullshit about non sequiturs either. I'm not just content with running in circles while you strawman over and over and continuously present your inability to even reference Q while making bold and misleading characterizations. Saying "nobody did anything about it because they were trusting Q" is retarded and I think you know that. Q encouraged everyone to do their own research and think for themselves. You can't even point to who Q is. How are you going to blame an amorphous placeholder name for "guy that said some things on the internet once" for making everyone not riot like you wanted? You keep making this circular argument where you blame the audience because they listened to Q. That makes no sense. People can act or not based on their own volition. I think what you're really upset about is someone moralized normalfags and they didn't have egregious reactions to things you're not satisfied with. You keep bring up how Q did things they didn't do. It was the average Norman who "decided not to riot". You've no reason to blame Q for any of that. All it was doing was disseminating information. Even then, coaxing the populace to doing a revolution because you're bummed things didn't go your way is selfish and retarded.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

So you agree then that it's not fair to blame a movement that's been alive for a mere four years for this kind of development, right?

I mean I can agree that it’s not fair to blame the Q movement for the absolute state of our country, but that’s never what I’ve done. I’ve blamed it for taking people out of the game and making them complacent during THE LARGEST EVENT AGAINST FREEDOM IN AMERICAN HISTORY.

Like, do you not recognize this? The American government has been TAKEN OVER by hostile forces. Do you think ANYTHING LIKE THAT has happened in the last 70 years? THAT IS THE EVENT that Q allowed

Why can we not use the cycle as an opportunity to reshape the American peoples' ideas as they relate to current political climates?

Why can we not use the cycle in which ENEMY FORCES HAVE LITERALLY OVERTHROWN THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT to reshape the citizens’ ideas?

Literally THIS is why people call you qtards. Holy fuck.

“Let’s just let them take over the government with a fraudulent election THIS time, because when we give people time to think about it they’ll vote differently in the NEXT fraudulent election.”

Fuck fuck fuck. It’s legitimately bordering on unbearably painful to have this conversation with you. You are a globalist’s wet dream of a conservative

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

I’ve blamed it for taking people out of the game and making them complacent during THE LARGEST EVENT AGAINST FREEDOM IN AMERICAN HISTORY.

Enticing them to perform civil actions before burning down any more Wendy's doesn't seem like they're being complacent to me. Doing their own research and learning how to curb different kinds of propaganda and think for themselves doesn't seem complacent. Dedicating leisure time to investigative citizen journalism doesn't seem complacent either. I think you just want these things to not be true so you can be right, but you don't even consider learning anything about ongoing methods or occurrences within the Q communities. You're just fabricating ridiculous lies. Q didn't "allow the government to be infiltrated" decades ago...

Why can we not use the cycle in which ENEMY FORCES HAVE LITERALLY OVERTHROWN THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT to reshape the citizens’ ideas?

That's what's happening. You just prefer it be done a different way. Our argument is about you being quick to violence. I'm trying to talk some sense in to you by pointing out that much more is occurring than what you're seeing and that you're choosing not to notice and instead pointing the finger and shrieking about how things aren't happening the way you'd prefer. Should any kind of "revolution" or anything like it ever form, or even what might happen in requisite, you're probably one of the first people that would get locked in a cellar so that whatever is ongoing doesn't get completely upended by this kind of retarded rhetoric.

“Let’s just let them take over the government with a fraudulent election THIS time, because when we give people time to think about it they’ll vote differently in the NEXT fraudulent election.” Fuck fuck fuck. It’s legitimately bordering on unbearably painful to have this conversation with you. You are a globalist’s wet dream of a conservative

You cannot be serious. You just want people to jump to conclusions and do retarded things because you're bored and/or impatient. It sucks knowing everything needs to change and being close to powerless, doesn't it? I know. I share your feelings. Going on the internet and displaying your inability to game out some kind of plan, though, is a waste of your time, especially when there's people that are smarter than you on the internet.

Maybe just kick back and relax for a little while. I think you're going on the internet too much or watching the news too much. You're letting the talking heads talk you in to a blind panic. At the very least, if you're going to be consumed by news media and their bullshit headlines, try to get a feel for alternative perspectives and question whether or not certain ones make sense. I think your issue is that you think you know much more than you do and you think it's okay to speak about things before you understand them and that people who know more about the things ~~your~~ you're* discussing won't correct you. Unfortunately for you, I have much, much more time and energy than you do.

> I’ve blamed it for taking people out of the game and making them complacent during THE LARGEST EVENT AGAINST FREEDOM IN AMERICAN HISTORY. Enticing them to perform civil actions *before* burning down any more Wendy's doesn't seem like they're being complacent to me. Doing their own research and learning how to curb different kinds of propaganda and think for themselves doesn't seem complacent. Dedicating leisure time to investigative citizen journalism doesn't seem complacent either. I think you just *want* these things to not be true so you can be right, but you don't even consider learning anything about ongoing methods or occurrences within the Q communities. You're just fabricating ridiculous lies. Q didn't "allow the government to be infiltrated" decades ago... >Why can we not use the cycle in which ENEMY FORCES HAVE LITERALLY OVERTHROWN THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT to reshape the citizens’ ideas? That's what's happening. You just prefer it be done a different way. Our argument is about you being quick to violence. I'm trying to talk some sense in to you by pointing out that much more is occurring than what you're seeing and that you're choosing not to notice and instead pointing the finger and shrieking about how things aren't happening the way you'd prefer. Should any kind of "revolution" or anything like it ever form, or even what might happen in requisite, you're probably one of the first people that would get locked in a cellar so that whatever is ongoing doesn't get completely upended by this kind of retarded rhetoric. >“Let’s just let them take over the government with a fraudulent election THIS time, because when we give people time to think about it they’ll vote differently in the NEXT fraudulent election.” Fuck fuck fuck. It’s legitimately bordering on unbearably painful to have this conversation with you. You are a globalist’s wet dream of a conservative You cannot be serious. You just want people to jump to conclusions and do retarded things because you're bored and/or impatient. It sucks knowing everything needs to change and being close to powerless, doesn't it? I know. I share your feelings. Going on the internet and displaying your inability to game out some kind of plan, though, is a waste of your time, especially when there's people that are smarter than you on the internet. Maybe just kick back and relax for a little while. I think you're going on the internet too much or watching the news too much. You're letting the talking heads talk you in to a blind panic. At the very least, if you're going to be consumed by news media and their bullshit headlines, try to get a feel for alternative perspectives and question whether or not certain ones make sense. I think your issue is that you think you know much more than you do and you think it's okay to speak about things before you understand them and that people who know more about the things ~~your~~ you're* discussing won't correct you. Unfortunately for you, I have much, much more time and energy than you do.

parent
link