How are these questions inane? What makes them not pertinent to the discussion? What is it that you really want people to do, which they aren't doing? I have this growing feeling that the issue is you're entirely uncapable of actually answering any of those questions and this exact type of response further demonstrates my point.
I edited this in after a few seconds but I guess you saw the original too soon:
Doing ‘nothing’ is allowing your election to be overthrown. Doing ‘nothing’ is allowing mask mandates, vaccine mandates. Doing “something” is what our forefathers said we should do in these cases; water the tree of liberty.
So what ways would we accomplish any of those things? Go ahead. Say it.
I’ve said it to you over and over. I don’t know why you think I’m afraid.
Calls to violence, in terms of American law, call for violence on specific people or groups at specific times or places.
Saying that corrupt politicians need to hang in the streets isn’t illegal.
Saying that Americans should arm up and march on DC isn’t illegal.
How many people do you think were involved in the Q movement? As in, observers, trusting the plan?
A million? Five million?
If even 5% of those were people that would have been willing to arm up when it was necessary, then the Q movement took 50-250 thousand soldiers out of a revolutionary army that would have stopped the coup that happened in our country.
Instead you and people like you convinced those soldiers that they were better off waiting for the big orange jew to save us all. Which obviously is not going to happen.
(post is archived)