Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

878

Have you noticed how quietly they have been arresting traitors responsible for the Big Steal in AZ? Of course you have not, it aint happening!

So glad all the money was wasted "looking" for fraud. And now, because nothing is happening and nobody is going to jail, the left was right - there was no fraud. "81,000,000 people in the USA really did vote for Biden" is now validated. It's really fucked up The Steal Stands, unbelievable!

Have you noticed how quietly they have been arresting traitors responsible for the Big Steal in AZ? Of course you have not, it aint happening! So glad all the money was wasted "looking" for fraud. And now, because nothing is happening and nobody is going to jail, the left was right - there was no fraud. "81,000,000 people in the USA really did vote for Biden" is now validated. It's really fucked up The Steal Stands, unbelievable!

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (89).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

based on what every average moron you know said?

I don’t know a single average moron who believes in Q. I can, however, link you to several archived prominent Q sites, discords, gabs, subs, etc where the 10 days of darkness was actively discussed.

Like you’re sitting here trying to pretend that the 10 days of darkness is some made up thing to discredit the Q movement, and you absolutely know that it’s not. You’re just trying to pretend that nobody thought it was real because of how vaguely (intentionally) Q posts are worded.

So please, tell me, you high IQ individual who Q was intended for, what DOES “Dark. [10]” mean?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

no, there you go again.. so moronic.

there is ONE Q not " i can link you to" blah blah..

so for something on the bible you going to quote from the bible, or link to to blah blah blah??????

why would you "link me to blah blah blah" when every single thing Q ever posted is available???

why? for the sake of disinformation? why would you do that? so you want to attack Q but want to INSIST ON USING other sources rather than actual Q drops to do so?

no dude you're a fucking moron i already proved it, and now you double down on the nonsense.

you cant prove Q to be wrong by pointing to NOT Q... that's fucking STUPID!!!!! and you don't even get it and have to be told multiple times. YOU ARE FUCKING STUPID DUDE QUIT TRYING TO ATTACK SOMETHING YOU DONT UNDERSTAND!!! you don't even have a simple understanding of basic logic, so yeah good luck attacking something you don't understand. here is a hint, Q doesn't have your name on its underwear kid.. slobber on something you understand like eating glue... or mixing play doh till it turns brown like your #2 stains.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

You conveniently didn’t respond to the actual question.

So please, tell me, you high IQ individual who Q was intended for, what DOES “Dark. [10]” mean?

Also,

why would you "link me to blah blah blah" when every single thing Q ever posted is available???

Because Q doesn’t fucking SAY anything. The only people who SAY anything are the decoders. Why would I link you to a fucking code that’s indecipherable as evidence of anything?

If we were arguing about the enigma code from wwii you could say “the Germans said ______” and I could say “no they didn’t, look!”

A T W G D F X E T U A R N I D S P Q L W H R T P D C A J K U D P O Z G R N B T K B B N E M R T O V L D

“All you can link me to is what morons SAID about the code, but that’s not what the GERMANS said!”

If we’re discussing a code of course it makes sense to look at the translation of the code and not at the code itself

[–] • 0 pt

you are clueless.

at least you admit it.