I don't think you're afraid. I think you're unprepared, naive, lazy and incapable of the complex gaming and architectural insights that are demanded of a revolting populace. This isn't me insisting it's illegal to say "we need to revolt". I don't know if you're seriously thinking that's where I was aiming you, but, as I've stated over and over again, feds love to watch places like this and catch proles doing naughty things they aren't supposed to. Instead, the aim is to show you that you're incapable of organizing the needed debrief and dissemination of intelligence that would be required. You're incapable of determining just how deep influences go, who's really on what team, how to oust double agents or notice infiltrators, how to cut off back up or escape plans, how to go down rat lines and nip them in the bud, how to moralize enough people to fight on your side, how to use legal maneuvers to protect yourself from them bearing down legal weight on you, how to organize civil disobedience, how to calm the public down when it's over, how to rebuild after we've destroyed a bunch of shit and how to ensure the continuity and maintenance of what you rebuild in to.
Do you know how many times people have tried to organize something and it got infiltrated? Do you understand the lengths which our enemies (again, we're not enemies, you're just retarded enough to think we are) can go to in order to shape public opinions? Do you know the extent of their control in legal parameters? Do you know how to use legal precedent to protect yourself in the event they use their legal powers?
You don't know how to do any of that shit. That's the real issue here. Your suggested solutions are no more complex than, "... I dunno... just like... hang 'em and stuff" while you feebly kick dirt like a confused toddler. I hate to break it to you, big guy, but someone already stole your idea and it's been running for decades. Yeah, yeah, I know sport, you don't like that it isn't moving fast enough and you want it now. Well boo-fucking-hoo. Things won't work at your preferred pace. Suck it up like a big boy.
Instead, the aim is to show you that you're incapable of organizing the needed debrief and dissemination of intelligence that would be required. You're incapable of determining just how deep influences go, who's really on what team, how to oust double agents or notice infiltrators, how to cut off back up or escape plans, how to go down rat lines and nip them in the bud, how to moralize enough people to fight on your side, how to use legal maneuvers to protect yourself from them bearing down legal weight on you, how to organize civil disobedience, how to calm the public down when it's over, how to rebuild after we've destroyed a bunch of shit and how to ensure the continuity and maintenance of what you rebuild in to.
Me, personally? Probably right. Can you say that about every single one of the millions of Q followers? Because those are the people who got removed from the army, not me.
Do you know how many times people have tried to organize something and it got infiltrated?
Do you know how many times people were complacent and they got conquered/enslaved?
again, we're not enemies, you're just retarded enough to think we are
See, this is probably the root of the problem. I don’t view you as an enemy, but your assumption is that I do because I attack your views. All I’m here doing is showing you that your views have led us here. Now. With these problems and these tyrants. Your views have saved us from nothing. They have stopped nothing. They have done nothing to re-americanize america. Yet you’re holding onto this hope that they’re going to.
That’s where we disconnect. That’s it. I recognize that Q has been lying and you do not. Period.
Me, personally? Probably right. Can you say that about every single one of the millions of Q followers? Because those are the people who got removed from the army, not me.
I don't see why you're changing the tense of the argument. We were arguing about something that's already happened... not some hypothetical. Your accusations only work in the past tense.
Do you know how many times people were complacent and they got conquered/enslaved?
I don't see how that is any kind of demonstration about how I'm wrong about the intricacies of your plan or why it's better than what /ourguys/ have concocted.
I don’t view you as an enemy, but your assumption is that I do because I attack your views. All I’m here doing is showing you that your views have led us here.
Bull fucking shit. You're one of the first retards to chime in about anything Q related. You very clearly see yourself as being righteous and all of us as being wasteful and complacent, especially considering the very next sentence. Besides, you're wrong. My views aren't the ones that got us here. My views are more the reason we're starting to change the tide. Q is a reaction to the shitty faults of our Republic. They weren't the cause of it. You keep attaching complacency to Q like it came about fifty fucking years ago, when I wasn't even close to being alive and when The Plan wasn't even needed to be considered, let alone the requisite circumstances that inspired The Plan.
Your views have saved us from nothing. They have stopped nothing. They have done nothing to re-americanize america. Yet you’re holding onto this hope that they’re going to.
You realize that things have been shit for longer than the last four years, right?... Q hasn't been around for any longer than that. This is my big issue with you. Not only do you not understand what you're arguing about, you don't even understand adjacent circumstances or the history leading up until this point. Your argument here amounts to, "well if your complacent actions hadn't inspred the decay of America that are only manifesting in the last four years, we wouldn't have been deprecating four or five decades ago". Not only does this argument not follow, it makes you look desperate to formulate an argument on the go.
I recognize that Q has been lying and you do not. Period.
About what? Point to one of the drops. You're arguing with a strawman.
I don't see why you're changing the tense of the argument. We were arguing about something that's already happened... not some hypothetical. Your accusations only work in the past tense.
Uhh, are you retarded? If Q was fake in the past then he’s fake in the present. If Q pulled soldiers out in the past, then they were unavailable for past events. Like the inauguration of a usurper, maybe?
My views are more the reason we're starting to change the tide.
Starting to change the tide??? We are almost a full-blown communist dictator state. Fighters would have been available to stop this a year ago if it wasn’t for Qtard distraction
Bull fucking shit. You're one of the first retards to chime in about anything Q related
Okay? In what way does that mean that I view you as an enemy? I know that we both want the same thing, the problem is that you believe that someone is coming to give you that thing while I believe we need to take that thing. Do you not see why I would chime in on that?
About what? Point to one of the drops.
“Q was lying” is probably hyperbole; Q was a distraction that kept “intelligent people” preoccupied and convinced that the swamp was being thrown out while the swamp was actually being reinforced
(post is archived)