With some other input, it looks like this court doesn't have any real teeth.
I find it significant, though, that Twitter yanked it so fast - must be some truth in there somewhere.
apparently they didnt just yank it they deleted the guys account..
In my experience, they wouldn't do that unless the charges he discussed had actual substance. But maybe I'm just twitter-jaded.
there is some logic to that, especially for such a wild and outlandish claim, if its not true, why bother.. just let the natural debunk process take hold.
(post is archived)