>How is it you failed to notice things went wrong with the first shot ?
Apparently there was only one shot.
>>How is it you failed to notice things went wrong with the first shot ?
Apparently there was only one shot.
Since we are aware of the Spooks connection to Hollyweird, we need to keep eyes on.
First they allege that weapons safety was their number one priority ? Really , please explain when handed a firearm and told it is safe, your responsibility check the firearm anyway for safety reasons ? How many people in the past were shot by empty firearms ?
Next question is, since it reportedly was a single action revolver, meaning each time the firearm is fired the hammer must be cocked back to fire the next round. How is it you failed to notice things went wrong with the first shot ? The second shot and even the third shot ? Please explain this to we the people. We need to keep our eyes on this to see how the DA and SD handle this investigation.
Since we are aware of the Spooks connection to Hollyweird, we need to keep eyes on.
First they allege that weapons safety was their number one priority ? Really , please explain when handed a firearm and told it is safe, your responsibility check the firearm anyway for safety reasons ? How many people in the past were shot by empty firearms ?
Next question is, since it reportedly was a single action revolver, meaning each time the firearm is fired the hammer must be cocked back to fire the next round. How is it you failed to notice things went wrong with the first shot ? The second shot and even the third shot ? Please explain this to we the people. We need to keep our eyes on this to see how the DA and SD handle this investigation.
(post is archived)