I've got an inquiry in with someone who would know about this.
Curious - what's your issue with Peters? I like his presentation but wondered about him too. Welcome your opinion on why he isn't credible.
He's got a good presentation actually, and I was hopeful he'd stay just this side of fringe. Well produced alt-news is a rare thing and I'm always hungry for more.
I can't call out the specific shows that turned me off, but his guests, including that lady, were making absolutely false and ridiculous claims. His guests tend to be very sensationalist, often self-aggrandizing, and have said total nonsense, unchallenged by Peters. Few if any citations in the descriptions, or directions to find the evidence first hand. And I just get a bullshitty, used car salesman feel from the guy. At the least, he's doing a shit job of vetting and fact checking his own experts.
Also, thank you for donating. I donated the last round but am not comfortable with crypto. is working on other alternatives, so that's a good thing.
Check out the global sticky post on the front page and I also updated the donation page.
Agree with you about the sensationalism and necessity for good vetting. There are so many people coming out of the woodwork now - at least he doesn't claim to be a former Trump staffer - that's getting old.
And while we're on the vetting topic, I'm sick of people posting things on Twitter without providing a link yo the source document.
(post is archived)