WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

391

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Starts out well, then gets too technical, then sort of peters out at the end.

It should be divided into two essays, one on the social and political aspects of the Covid fraud for the average reader, and the other on the medical aspects of the disease and the vaccinations for the technical reader.

[–] 0 pt

Agreed. This stuff needs a lot of editing and re-formatting for different audiences.

However, it covers pretty much everything I think.

[–] 1 pt

The article is very technical, but don’t see any way around that for the article to be effective. I’m no scientist or genius but believe I got the gist.

The political and conspiracy statements at the end will be enough to have the article branded and banned, even though every word is probably true.

[–] 0 pt

Thanks. Transhuman discussions make us look crazy, but I always ask the person judging me..."What is your explanation for why they are putting graphene oxide into the injections?" They never have an answer. Also, I send them links to patents on the topic.