I've read a little on this, but I'm still not understanding how the media is reporting the audit shows Biden won by more.
I understand WHY.. lol, but I'm not understand what they are basing it on. Is there anything?
Well when the document starts by saying that the re-counted votes confirm Biden won, and they do, it gives the media and everyone else the opportunity to just stop there.
There were thousands of ballots that appeared to be illegal, and very little done by the manner of the presentation of this data to show that those votes were for Biden in a way that presented them with clarity.
For example, show a direct line from the duplicated ballots to Biden benefiting from them. I know we shouldn’t have to break it down to the elementary school level, but we do. And we didn’t. People who refuse to believe the election was stolen absolutely need to be spoonfed and the presentation of the data didn’t do that.
It seems like it was more important to them to look like they were unbiased but that’s a waste of time. Everyone is going to assume that the people involved in the audit believed the election was stolen going into it. Why waste time and effort and energy trying to cut off the bias argument? No one‘s going to believe that they weren’t biased anyway. So just present the data and go for the throat and show directly how the election was stolen. They didn’t do that.
A lot of the sites like this one populated by people who believe the election was stolen have barely even talked about the data once it was released. If it’s not even gaining traction in communities like this, it tells you how bad the presentation was.
I have no idea why they would present it in the way that they did. It’s beyond incompetent. They could not have done a worse job presenting this information if they had tried. It’s incredibly disheartening.
TLDR:
They recount the votes, the total shows Biden won, but that does not count for removing possible fraud ballots?
(post is archived)