WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

205

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Yes, well done, that's exactly the types of cancer he refers too. He is alerting to an anomaly in his real time diagnostic work he does as a pathologist. Does it now need thorough investigation - it sure does. He is provided a signal alert to what potentially may be a catastrophe among a particular set of vaccine recipients. Do you ignore actual science ??. Are you close-minded and fear further investigation ?? How long ago did you get your jab?? Had your booster yet??.

[–] 0 pt

Yes, well done, that's exactly the types of cancer he refers too.

The title on the post says, "20 times increase’ of cancer in vaccinated patients - LifeSite"

It is clearly misleading. This is dishonest and a lie. It is more anti-vax fearmongering.

When there's anti-science bullshit, I'm right around the corner to whine, bitch, and point out the bullshit. That's like my thing. The problem on this site is overabundance of retardedness when it comes to vaccines. Like, these folks spend hours pointing out hypocrisy, bullshit, and crime in politics. Like pros. But when it comes to science and vaccines, complete fucking retardedness, no critical thinking, etc. It's like their brains leave their bodies and it is street to reeeeeeee.

Does it now need thorough investigation - it sure does.

You do understand that this type of research has already been done and is still ongoing and he's not making a groundbreaking point at all and he's likely just spouting bullshit pseudoscience? We have hundreds of millions of data points, already. He's not going to magically discover something new like some sort of science fairy blessing us with groundbreaking findings.

[–] 0 pt

I agree, the title sounds very much like typical misleading fear porn. Yep, lots of the posts on this site are just regurgitation of click bait bs for likes and views.

However i completely dispute your claim 'that this type of research has been done and is still ongoing... '. The SARS-CoV 2 vaccine has only been around for roughly 8 months - i strongly doubt any research or study into 'cancers caused from the vaccine' has even been started let alone any clinical studies completed. They completely skipped the animal trials remember, which may have alerted to early signals requiring further investigation and study.

So you're really just conflating research and data from other areas as somehow equivalent and correlating to the unknown potential of Covid-19 vaccine induced risk . That's bad science, bro.

If you wanna prove me wrong give me links for actual clinical research being done on this subject, i'm all ears. Until then suggesting that this vaccine is or isn't potentially responsible for the types of cancer mentioned (after pathology diagnostic signals suggesting otherwise) is unsupported by the latest available data and implying otherwise is vaccine misinformation.

You didn't answer how long ago you got your jab ?? ...

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I agree, the title sounds very much like typical misleading fear porn. Yep, lots of the posts on this site are just regurgitation of click bait bs for likes and views.

Awesome. So we don't really disagree. We agree about 90%-95% which means we shouldn't be at each other's throats. I'll keep it respectful, then.

However i completely dispute your claim 'that this type of research has been done and is still ongoing... '.

It is. It's foundational work in Phase III trials for any pharmaceutical, not just COVID-19 vaccines. All adverse outcomes are tracked, not just specific things. Everything. And they control against population incidence (how often it occurs naturally in human populations). And the follow-ups on the Phase III trials don't end until 2023.

The SARS-CoV 2 vaccine has only been around for roughly 8 months

Almost exactly 1 year since Phase III human trials, actually. And they published the phase I human trial data in May 2020.

https://www.modernatx.com/modernas-work-potential-vaccine-against-covid-19

Pretty cool, right? They already had the mRNA tech solved before SARS-CoV-2 came around. It was just applying it in a very open and noticeable way that drew so much attention to the mRNA vaccines. This is why they could go so quickly to Phase I human trials shortly after the Alpha Variant started murder-fucking people in Italy and NY.

i strongly doubt any research or study into 'cancers caused from the vaccine' has even been started let alone any clinical studies completed.

Like I said, that's foundational, basics of basics, work done in human studies. That's definitely been done already in their human trial testing and is ongoing. Unlike silica shards that can cause cancer 40 years later in your longs, almost all adverse effects you'd see from a vaccine happen in the first 2 months.

They completely skipped the animal trials remember, which may have alerted to early signals requiring further investigation and study.

That's wrong. That was disinformation being spread on Facebook. Both Pfizer and Moderna tested on macaques and mice.

And the humans who participated in the early Phase I trials were made fully aware of the consequences, had to sign papers, and were compensated. Also, I think we should let prisoners pay their debt back to society by volunteering for these types of studies. Reduce their sentences if they prove they can work with medical staff to study new treatments and drugs. Sorry to get side-tracked.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-afs:Content:9792931264

Main takeaway:

"University of Pennsylvania professor of medicine Dr. Drew Weissman, who has been studying mRNA and mRNA vaccines for decades, said they do not cause dangerous inflammation to animals. Along with the vaccines for Pfizer and Moderna both passing animal trials, they also passed clinical trials on humans where they were tested on more than 70,000 people."

Remember, the mRNA vaccines are programming your body to produce specific antibodies that target specific antigens. It's programming your body to produce a key that unlocks pathogens (lyse) to kill them. The pharmacokinetics of mRNA vaccines have been solved for a while. We know how they work. We've tested them a lot. The only thing we are doing when we produce a new mRNA vaccine is adjusting the biological instruction sets to target other antigens. That's it. This is an easily repeatable process once you have sequenced the nucleotides of the target pathogen. Rinse. Repeat. View your natural immunity as a powerful shotgun and the mRNA vaccines as a sniper rifle - that is also why they have diminished efficacy against the Delta variant.

Until then suggesting that this vaccine is or isn't potentially responsible for the types of cancer mentioned (after pathology diagnostic signals suggesting otherwise) is unsupported by the latest available data and implying otherwise is vaccine misinformation.

Incorrect. The opposite is true. Suggesting that there is a new, magical, cancer that popped up and is caused by these specific vaccines is vaccine disinformation and amounts to pseudoscience. This doctor is definitely full of shit.

There's one primary reason why they cannot cause cancer: their payload pathway doesn't mess with your DNA at all. DNA mutations are what cause cancer. There's no pathway to cancer for the mRNA vaccines to cause them.

There are other pervasive pseudoscience arguments being made about the mRNA vaccines and causing cancer. Such as "the mRNA vaccines suppress certain proteins which prevented certain types of cancer." That one was false because it was basing it off of a study from 2018 when these mRNA vaccines didn't exist for this:

https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-afs:Content:9994785135