Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

667

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

Guess what. I no longer believe anything.

[–] • 0 pt

good man

[–] • 1 pt

Sadly, I have stopped sending these vids to my family who still think I’m the loon for staying intact by refusing the gene modification poison.

They just refuse to listen to the truth.

[–] • 0 pt

i know why i liked the matrix so much when i was young now.

[–] • 0 pt

Same here. All family is sheep.

[–] • 1 pt

Google hides this. Tried bing and got it on first result.

[–] • 0 pt

THIS IS TRUE!!!! And caused by mRNA so-called shot-clot jab!

How? Simple. As shown in pathology slides and post mortem slides, over 40% of T-Cells of a certain class are MISSING!

GONE! Over 40% of t-Cells for immune system MISSING AND GONE!

The problem? T-Cells are used in mammals to combat most cancers relentlessly , and also to keep back effects of long duration issues : herpes, cervical cancers, human papillomavirus warts, and more.

Soon to QUADRUPLE for Nov 2021 : cancers in jabbed, HPV in jabbed and more!

Fun fact, ALL CAUSE MORTALITY stats for August 2021 are in and jabbed idiots died at 800% higher rate in UK, and 430% higher rate in USA

all-cause mortality is all deaths, and in this case NOT adjusted for age, IQ, race, lifestyle, and maybe jabbed were older than non-jabbed.

But soon this all-cause mortality will climb higher.

Fuck the dead.

Fuck idiots that took the jab.

[–] • -1 pt (edited )

Idaho doctor reports...

Not research. Can be thrown out as mad ramblings. Seriously. Until he has a normalized data set with a process that can be 'results duplicated', this is bullshit science. This is why we have science - so people who are mad can't push bullshit like this doctor.

And the specific type of cancer he's talking about is endometrial which is specific to the lining of the uterus. Comes from the anatomical term "endometrium" which refers to the internal/inside of the uterus. Or uterine wall.

[–] • 0 pt

Yes, well done, that's exactly the types of cancer he refers too. He is alerting to an anomaly in his real time diagnostic work he does as a pathologist. Does it now need thorough investigation - it sure does. He is provided a signal alert to what potentially may be a catastrophe among a particular set of vaccine recipients. Do you ignore actual science ??. Are you close-minded and fear further investigation ?? How long ago did you get your jab?? Had your booster yet??.

[–] • 0 pt

Yes, well done, that's exactly the types of cancer he refers too.

The title on the post says, "20 times increase’ of cancer in vaccinated patients - LifeSite"

It is clearly misleading. This is dishonest and a lie. It is more anti-vax fearmongering.

When there's anti-science bullshit, I'm right around the corner to whine, bitch, and point out the bullshit. That's like my thing. The problem on this site is overabundance of retardedness when it comes to vaccines. Like, these folks spend hours pointing out hypocrisy, bullshit, and crime in politics. Like pros. But when it comes to science and vaccines, complete fucking retardedness, no critical thinking, etc. It's like their brains leave their bodies and it is street to reeeeeeee.

Does it now need thorough investigation - it sure does.

You do understand that this type of research has already been done and is still ongoing and he's not making a groundbreaking point at all and he's likely just spouting bullshit pseudoscience? We have hundreds of millions of data points, already. He's not going to magically discover something new like some sort of science fairy blessing us with groundbreaking findings.

[–] • 0 pt

I agree, the title sounds very much like typical misleading fear porn. Yep, lots of the posts on this site are just regurgitation of click bait bs for likes and views.

However i completely dispute your claim 'that this type of research has been done and is still ongoing... '. The SARS-CoV 2 vaccine has only been around for roughly 8 months - i strongly doubt any research or study into 'cancers caused from the vaccine' has even been started let alone any clinical studies completed. They completely skipped the animal trials remember, which may have alerted to early signals requiring further investigation and study.

So you're really just conflating research and data from other areas as somehow equivalent and correlating to the unknown potential of Covid-19 vaccine induced risk . That's bad science, bro.

If you wanna prove me wrong give me links for actual clinical research being done on this subject, i'm all ears. Until then suggesting that this vaccine is or isn't potentially responsible for the types of cancer mentioned (after pathology diagnostic signals suggesting otherwise) is unsupported by the latest available data and implying otherwise is vaccine misinformation.

You didn't answer how long ago you got your jab ?? ...