1 it's not my opinion. It's fact. 2 I already know what that are pushing. Everyone is very well aware what's coming our way. I would hope everyone is prepared or is preparing for this. No one here said this is a movie.
My question is why are you the only one pushing this as approved. On here.
1 it's not my opinion. It's fact.
You have not shown where it is fact. You are skipping over the part where it says the BLA was approved for non-immunocompromised populations for the prevention of COIVD infection. I keep pointing it out to you but you keep ignoring it. That does not make your opinion fact.
My question is why are you the only one pushing this as approved. On here.
I am pushing this because people like you are lying to other gullible people about the true content of this document. We don't need more disinformation pushed under the guise of 'muh patriots'. You don't understand the document and its contents yet you continue to promote your opinion as fact. I am here to dispel your falsehoods because truth should not be censored or minimized. You are acting just like a disinfo shill but wearing a patriot's disguise while you do it. I don't want more disinformation spread around so I am countering you and your post. You seem to be the one with a bigger agenda here, not me. Why is it so important for you to censor the truth on this matter? Why are you trying to promote this lie that COMIRNATY is not approved when the document clearly states it? Why are you trying to get people to run with this information when it will only prove to be another talking point for the left to make vaxx skeptical people look like buffoons once again? Who pays you to do this?
I don't like that it got approval one bit. I don't want it to be forced upon us. I'm not going to let people lie about these facts. Truth must be brought into the light, even when that truth isn't what you want to hear. Deal with it. It's happening whether you like it or not.
One I'm not lying or selling a anyone a bill of goods here. Now I have heard people have different understanding of what this is. One is that there was a name change and that's what the FDA approved. 2 they approved phizer under a different name. But they are not going to give anyone that approved vaccine. They will still give people the EUA version under the guise of the FDA approved version. That way they won't be liable with people getting side-effects. Does make sense as they are not liable either way and it would be the same thing anyway. So guess more research is needed on this
(post is archived)