WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

121

Just like people not wanting to speak out against evil because it might make them lose their "money" Pharmaceutical companies and those that are in bed with them don't want to lose their "money". AT what point do you say "screw the money" I'm going to do what's right? I think we know the answer to that. Very few will do it.

Are effective COVID medications like Ivermectin being suppressed because they could cause vaccines to lose government funding? Not very long after the pandemic lockdowns began last year, we heard of a potential treatment for COVID-19 involving the off-label use of an existing medication called Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ).

A French doctor published two studies which showed amazing results. Soon thereafter President Trump mentioned the drug in a press conference as a potential game changer. Dr. Fauci dismissed the studies as “anecdotal”.

Hospital trials and observational studies soon began but they quickly showed the medication to be ineffective as a prophylaxis or as a treatment. But in every study, there was something wrong. Either the dosage was way too high or too low, it was only given to patients in severe stages impossible to recover or without Zinc, which was imperative. It seemed as if only minutes later, HCQ and anyone who mentioned it were viciously attacked for promoting quacks and snake oil.

Then an observational study was published in prestigious medical journals that claimed HCQ was ineffective and dangerous, causing cardiac-related complications. Ongoing trials and testing were halted immediately, and the FDA issued a warning advising HCQ not be used to treat COVID. Then, for the first time in history, the FDA restricted doctors from prescribing an approved medication for off-label use. The WHO and the rest of the world immediately followed suit literally stopping all research and testing of HCQ overnight.

Months later we learn that same study was completely fabricated and fraudulent after an investigative journalist analyzed the data. The study was retracted, but the damage had already been done.

>Just like people not wanting to speak out against evil because it might make them lose their "money" Pharmaceutical companies and those that are in bed with them don't want to lose their "money". AT what point do you say "screw the money" I'm going to do what's right? I think we know the answer to that. Very few will do it. Are effective COVID medications like Ivermectin being suppressed because they could cause vaccines to lose government funding? Not very long after the pandemic lockdowns began last year, we heard of a potential treatment for COVID-19 involving the off-label use of an existing medication called Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). A French doctor published two studies which showed amazing results. Soon thereafter President Trump mentioned the drug in a press conference as a potential game changer. Dr. Fauci dismissed the studies as “anecdotal”. Hospital trials and observational studies soon began but they quickly showed the medication to be ineffective as a prophylaxis or as a treatment. But in every study, there was something wrong. Either the dosage was way too high or too low, it was only given to patients in severe stages impossible to recover or without Zinc, which was imperative. It seemed as if only minutes later, HCQ and anyone who mentioned it were viciously attacked for promoting quacks and snake oil. Then an observational study was published in prestigious medical journals that claimed HCQ was ineffective and dangerous, causing cardiac-related complications. Ongoing trials and testing were halted immediately, and the FDA issued a warning advising HCQ not be used to treat COVID. Then, for the first time in history, the FDA restricted doctors from prescribing an approved medication for off-label use. The WHO and the rest of the world immediately followed suit literally stopping all research and testing of HCQ overnight. Months later we learn that same study was completely fabricated and fraudulent after an investigative journalist analyzed the data. The study was retracted, but the damage had already been done.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

And it would interfere with the mass genocide they have planned.

Money is definitely a bonus.

These people are pure evil.

[–] 1 pt

And it would interfere with the mass genocide they have planned. Money is definitely a bonus. These people are pure evil.

Couldn't have said it better myself.