So basically nothing showing actual evidence of fraud only 'expert analysis that there was fraud'. When you dont have the actual machines , networks or severs used to forensically audit - and then you dont enforce election or audit law that is being broken with abandon- this is what you get and deserve.
o basically nothing showing actual evidence of fraud
Did you watch anything? LOL.
Yes, i am being serious and not a jerk but can you point me to a concise condensed amalgamation of the 'forensic audit evidence' presented during the three days - something that is 'verifiable' as proof for election fraud ??. Most people i presume don't have time to watch three entire days of 'opinionated analysis', i just want to see the actual 'proof' he billed the symposium for presenting, ie - 'what i do present will be irrefutable for SCOTUS ...' - his words.
"what i do present will be irrefutable for SCOTUS ...'" Not sure there is anything that will convince a person with eye's wide shut.
You might have to wait a while if the flow of info across the internet wasn't enough proof that the machines were hooked up to the internet and being sent to China and Germany. The fact that there were 90% of the population registered to vote when anyone involved in elections knows it never gets above 60-65%.
(post is archived)