No. He explain how it *could have been* done. This is the exact fucking problem. We just spent three days explaining how it *could* happen while doing next to nothing to prove we actually *caught them doing it.* We got a little bit of it, but we needed a lot more of the following: the raw data, how it was verified. The method of data collection, how it was verified. Physical evidence of the movement of votes, VERIFIED, and HOW it was verified and how we can prove as much. These people are spinning their wheels and producing almost NOTHING we can actually PROVE.