I have. I disagree that this post is merely a staging ground for shill tactics. There are people that genuinely disagree and I'm glad to see when they manage to disagree respectfully without the usual rudeness.
You are of course free to disagree. But it didn't change what I said nor its accuracy; even if it may or may not apply everytime. You politely asked and I answered.
You're providing a platform to people who are generally low IQ or shills. There is nothing productive to be made here.
They are generally unable to think their way out of a wet paper bag. They always refuse to answer any question which they know invalidates their entire position. Or at least provides room for pause. They are never here with earnest truth seeking. Which means they are pushing someone's agenda.
You're providing a platform to people who are generally low IQ or shills. There is nothing productive to be made here.
They are generally unable to think their way out of a wet paper bag. They always refuse to answer any question which they know invalidates their entire position. Or at least provides room for pause. They are never here with earnest truth seeking. Which means they are pushing someone's agenda.
Q critics make those same points against Q followers. Genuine people exist on both sides. I'm aware there are some shills, but I'm even more aware that dismissing others as shills is a problem in this sub and the site as a whole.
If they were genuine, they could answer questions. Which drives us back to low IQ (dunning-kruger, backfire effect, useful idiot) or shill (loop to platform comment).
Edit: both are counter productive
(post is archived)