Remember that this isn't as simple as one side against another. I am not shilling for Q so don't take it that way. I will point out some important things though. Q outed Edward Snowden. Huge. Whoever thinks Snowden is a hero isn't playing the right game. Q outed Assange. Important fact: London has tunnels linking buildings that go back at least to WWII. With that said, they have to go back at the very least to a decade before WWII. Assange wasn't locked in an embassy. He came and went through the tunnels like everyone else and created quite the stir with his ridiculous embassy cat. People bought it though. Now that he is in custody I am to assume something changed, though that can be all smoke and mirrors too. Bradley Mannings father works for the Office of Naval Intelligence. Digging deep into Assange shows it was always controlled opposition. From the very beginning. Q shifted that and showed people. Outing the Chandlers was huge too. Prior to that no one ever gave that a single thought. These sites are heavily monitored. There is no way the chans, voat, and this place can post without it being traced even with a vpn. Which are kinda laughable at this point. I'm not going all in and betting on Q. I wouldn't go all in for anyone at this point. But outing Eric Schmidt was a big deal and everyone who works around him knows it. What comes of it, I don't know. I know an extremely high profile celebrity was arrested and it hasn't seen a single second of air time.. Will it ever? Who knows? Certainly not me, but if a single person started to work out a piece of the puzzle then it matters. Just saying.
(post is archived)