>The mods don't deleted them based on fact or truth, but because they are too mean. I really have to keep explaining to grown adults the value of civility? Okay. The first rule states: >Free debate is allowed and encouraged as long as it is civil. What's the point of that rule? The previous mod became notorious for banning any dissenting opinion of any kind. He did that so much he had to be replaced, and I decided opinions that disagree should be allowed. Why do I keep harping on civility? Because past moderation and beliefs of Q followers make non-Q right-wing spaces very aggressive towards Q people. So aggressive there are some critics who interact here more than other subs. In turn, this makes Q people defensive and bitter because because their used to being berated. To handle that issue, I tell people they must have civil discussions. Critics always say something like "hey, I'm telling those LOSERS the truth because they need to wake up." But I doubt their motives are earnest when they're so vicious. Being venomous towards others makes them defensive and less likely to see the points being made. When people again and again choose to hiss at Q followers that looks to me like they want a punching bag for their frustrations and not a genuine desire to inform anyone. If anyone can't handle acting like an adult on this sub, I encourage them to block it.