The Covid-19 injection is classified as 'experimental'. Under Federal law: **21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1)** - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies, there is a clear provision for **the option to accept or refuse administration of the experimental product**. This means no business, **including airlines** can mandate vaccination for employees (new or otherwise) or require Vaccine Passports. This means college/university/CUNY and SUNI requirements for Covid vaccination is unlawful. This means no government can require Vaccine Passports due to its unlawfulness. Government rules, guidelines, and recommendations do **not** exceed or meet statutory law. It is **always** inferior even under executive order. Only the legislature can create law. Hospitals also fall under this law. Nurses, medical doctors, and staff that have refused the Covid injection and lost their job as a result have a very valid case for lawsuits. Here is the law for Emergency Authorization Use (EAU). Remember that ALL these Covid injections are categorized as **Not Approved** by the FDA. **16 Am Jur 2D Section 98**. *“An emergency can not create power and no emergency justifies the violation of ANY OF THE PROVISIONS of the United States Constitution or States Constitutions.”* Furthermore, **16 Am Jur 2d., Sec. 97**: *“Then a constitution should receive a literal interpretation in favor of the Citizen, is especially true, with respect to those provisions which were designed to safeguard the liberty and security of the Citizen in regard to person and property.”* **Bary v. United States - 273 US 128** *“Any constitutional provision intended to confer a benefit should be liberally construed in favor in the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.”* Federal law prohibits the ***”denial of participation”*** from this business establishment as found under **28 CFR §36.202**. Colleges and universities are businesses. Under **28 CFR §36.202(c)** further states that unless I have been individually assessed as a ***“direct threat”*** you may not exclude me from the same and equal services as others. Denying service is a violation of **Title II, III, and VII of the U.S. Civil Right Act of 1964**. Title III Sections **28 CFR §36.202(a)(b)(c)** and **28 CFR §36.203(a)(b)(c)** state that I shall not be denied the same participation and equal access as everyone else. The law prohibits Alaska Airlines or Delta Airlines and others from treating anyone differently or from serving anyone separately. **21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1)** - **Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies** (A) Required conditions: (ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed— (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product; (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and **(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.** OSHA released its new ***guidance*** on April 20 under a “Frequently Asked Questions” section of its website having to do with COVID-19 safety compliance. NOTE the word 'guidance' is **not** law by any means, but rather a recommendation or a suggestion. Q: If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable? A: If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under **29 CFR 1904.6** and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in **29 CFR 1904.7**. Furthermore, demanding an individual to be vaccinated or to wear a face mask as a precondition for employment or entering a business may be liable for any resulting injuries. Face masks are designated by the FDA as a medical device and regulated under 21 CFR 878.4040. Herewith, demanding an employee or store patron to wear a mask is the unlicensed practice of medicine. Ordering employees, vendors and patrons to accept medical advice from business personnel or store attendants (wearing a face mask or other) is not only a crime (unlicensed practice of medicine), but violates the 42 US Code §2000(a); Public Accommodations, which prohibits discrimination of people with a disability and certain religious convictions. Simply stated, the employer and employees have no idea of my medical condition and are not licensed or insured medical practitioners. The Employer or Store Manager and other employees are prohibited by law from giving medical advice, such as advising employees or patrons to wear face masks or to be vaccinated. In general, the unlawful practice of medicine is regarded as the advice given specific to a particular person's illness or injury, and has the weight of authority and the possibility of doing harm. A typical State Code or Statute states: > “It is unlawful for any person to practice medicine by offering or undertaking to prevent or to diagnose, correct, or treat in any manner or by any means, methods, devices, or instrumentalities, any disease, illness, pain, wound, fracture, infirmity, deformity or defect of any person;” A condition of employment or public accommodation to anyone who conscientiously objects against being vaccinated or to wear a face mask, whether it is for religious or medical reasons, most certainly falls under the legal definition of experiencing **'duress'** as a result of the unlawful practice of medicine. Black’s Law Dictionary defines duress as: > “Any unlawful threat or coercion used by a person, to induce another to act (or to refrain from acting) in a manner he or she otherwise would not (or would).” Subjecting person to improper pressure which overcomes his will and coerces him to comply with demand to which he would not yield if acting as free agent. Head v. Gadaden Civil Service BD., Ala.Civ., 389 So.2d 516, 519. Coersion is also defined as -- "a threat to expose a secret or deformity, publish a defamatory statement, or otherwise to expose any person to disgrace or ridicule." An employer forcing a person to wear a mask because they are not vaccinated fits the unlawful act of coersion. Furthermore, experiencing duress as a result of an employer, or business or store attendant who “follows, monitors, or pursues another, whether in person or through any available technological or other means” is unlawful harassment. The key factor is when: “mental distress, mental suffering, or mental anguish as demonstrated by a victim's response to an act” occurs as a result of being wrongly denied their right due to their medical condition or religious belief and under the duress of the employee being discriminated against or fired or the store manager calling the police. Employers and stores are dicta prius, not an insured medical practitioner, nor is it equipped to respond to medical emergencies created by its own rules (that violate the law and its own policies). If an employee or patron was forced to act on the employer’s or store’s medical advice and then experienced a medical emergency, the person and entity is liable henceforth to any injuries that may occur and may also be criminally negligent. For the duration of the COVID-19 public health emergency declared pursuant to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d), this Act makes it **unlawful** under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act for any person, partnership, or corporation to engage in a deceptive act or practice in or affecting commerce associated with the treatment, cure, prevention, mitigation, or diagnosis of COVID–19 or a government benefit related to COVID–19. The Act provides that such a violation shall be treated as a violation of a rule defining an unfair or deceptive act or practice prescribed under Sec. 18(a)(1)(B) of the FTC Act. **Section 242 of Title 18**, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of **Section 242**, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any. **TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242** Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.