It Is Unlawful for an Employer to Mandate Vaccine or Wearing a Face Mask

1.2K

•

The Covid-19 injection is classified as 'experimental'. Under Federal law:

21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1) - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies, there is a clear provision for the option to accept or refuse administration of the experimental product.

This means no business, including airlines can mandate vaccination for employees (new or otherwise) or require Vaccine Passports.

This means college/university/CUNY and SUNI requirements for Covid vaccination is unlawful.

This means no government can require Vaccine Passports due to its unlawfulness.

Government rules, guidelines, and recommendations do not exceed or meet statutory law. It is always inferior even under executive order. Only the legislature can create law. Hospitals also fall under this law. Nurses, medical doctors, and staff that have refused the Covid injection and lost their job as a result have a very valid case for lawsuits. Here is the law for Emergency Authorization Use (EAU). Remember that ALL these Covid injections are categorized as Not Approved by the FDA.

16 Am Jur 2D Section 98. “An emergency can not create power and no emergency justifies the violation of ANY OF THE PROVISIONS of the United States Constitution or States Constitutions.”

Furthermore,

16 Am Jur 2d., Sec. 97: “Then a constitution should receive a literal interpretation in favor of the Citizen, is especially true, with respect to those provisions which were designed to safeguard the liberty and security of the Citizen in regard to person and property.” Bary v. United States - 273 US 128 “Any constitutional provision intended to confer a benefit should be liberally construed in favor in the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.”

Federal law prohibits the ”denial of participation” from this business establishment as found under 28 CFR §36.202. Colleges and universities are businesses.

Under 28 CFR §36.202(c) further states that unless I have been individually assessed as a “direct threat” you may not exclude me from the same and equal services as others.

Denying service is a violation of Title II, III, and VII of the U.S. Civil Right Act of 1964.

Title III Sections 28 CFR §36.202(a)(b)(c) and 28 CFR §36.203(a)(b)(c) state that I shall not be denied the same participation and equal access as everyone else. The law prohibits Alaska Airlines or Delta Airlines and others from treating anyone differently or from serving anyone separately.

21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1) - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies

(A) Required conditions: (ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed— (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product; (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and (III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.

OSHA released its new guidance on April 20 under a “Frequently Asked Questions” section of its website having to do with COVID-19 safety compliance. NOTE the word 'guidance' is not law by any means, but rather a recommendation or a suggestion.

Q: If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable?

A: If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7.

Furthermore, demanding an individual to be vaccinated or to wear a face mask as a precondition for employment or entering a business may be liable for any resulting injuries.

Face masks are designated by the FDA as a medical device and regulated under 21 CFR 878.4040. Herewith, demanding an employee or store patron to wear a mask is the unlicensed practice of medicine.

Ordering employees, vendors and patrons to accept medical advice from business personnel or store attendants (wearing a face mask or other) is not only a crime (unlicensed practice of medicine), but violates the 42 US Code §2000(a); Public Accommodations, which prohibits discrimination of people with a disability and certain religious convictions. Simply stated, the employer and employees have no idea of my medical condition and are not licensed or insured medical practitioners. The Employer or Store Manager and other employees are prohibited by law from giving medical advice, such as advising employees or patrons to wear face masks or to be vaccinated. In general, the unlawful practice of medicine is regarded as the advice given specific to a particular person's illness or injury, and has the weight of authority and the possibility of doing harm. A typical State Code or Statute states:

“It is unlawful for any person to practice medicine by offering or undertaking to prevent or to diagnose, correct, or treat in any manner or by any means, methods, devices, or instrumentalities, any disease, illness, pain, wound, fracture, infirmity, deformity or defect of any person;”

A condition of employment or public accommodation to anyone who conscientiously objects against being vaccinated or to wear a face mask, whether it is for religious or medical reasons, most certainly falls under the legal definition of experiencing 'duress' as a result of the unlawful practice of medicine. Black’s Law Dictionary defines duress as:

“Any unlawful threat or coercion used by a person, to induce another to act (or to refrain from acting) in a manner he or she otherwise would not (or would).” Subjecting person to improper pressure which overcomes his will and coerces him to comply with demand to which he would not yield if acting as free agent. Head v. Gadaden Civil Service BD., Ala.Civ., 389 So.2d 516, 519. Coersion is also defined as -- "a threat to expose a secret or deformity, publish a defamatory statement, or otherwise to expose any person to disgrace or ridicule." An employer forcing a person to wear a mask because they are not vaccinated fits the unlawful act of coersion.

Furthermore, experiencing duress as a result of an employer, or business or store attendant who “follows, monitors, or pursues another, whether in person or through any available technological or other means” is unlawful harassment. The key factor is when: “mental distress, mental suffering, or mental anguish as demonstrated by a victim's response to an act” occurs as a result of being wrongly denied their right due to their medical condition or religious belief and under the duress of the employee being discriminated against or fired or the store manager calling the police.

Employers and stores are dicta prius, not an insured medical practitioner, nor is it equipped to respond to medical emergencies created by its own rules (that violate the law and its own policies). If an employee or patron was forced to act on the employer’s or store’s medical advice and then experienced a medical emergency, the person and entity is liable henceforth to any injuries that may occur and may also be criminally negligent.

For the duration of the COVID-19 public health emergency declared pursuant to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d), this Act makes it unlawful under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act for any person, partnership, or corporation to engage in a deceptive act or practice in or affecting commerce associated with the treatment, cure, prevention, mitigation, or diagnosis of COVID–19 or a government benefit related to COVID–19. The Act provides that such a violation shall be treated as a violation of a rule defining an unfair or deceptive act or practice prescribed under Sec. 18(a)(1)(B) of the FTC Act.

Section 242 of Title 18, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.

For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

The Covid-19 injection is classified as 'experimental'. Under Federal law: **21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1)** - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies, there is a clear provision for **the option to accept or refuse administration of the experimental product**. This means no business, **including airlines** can mandate vaccination for employees (new or otherwise) or require Vaccine Passports. This means college/university/CUNY and SUNI requirements for Covid vaccination is unlawful. This means no government can require Vaccine Passports due to its unlawfulness. Government rules, guidelines, and recommendations do **not** exceed or meet statutory law. It is **always** inferior even under executive order. Only the legislature can create law. Hospitals also fall under this law. Nurses, medical doctors, and staff that have refused the Covid injection and lost their job as a result have a very valid case for lawsuits. Here is the law for Emergency Authorization Use (EAU). Remember that ALL these Covid injections are categorized as **Not Approved** by the FDA. **16 Am Jur 2D Section 98**. *“An emergency can not create power and no emergency justifies the violation of ANY OF THE PROVISIONS of the United States Constitution or States Constitutions.”* Furthermore, **16 Am Jur 2d., Sec. 97**: *“Then a constitution should receive a literal interpretation in favor of the Citizen, is especially true, with respect to those provisions which were designed to safeguard the liberty and security of the Citizen in regard to person and property.”* **Bary v. United States - 273 US 128** *“Any constitutional provision intended to confer a benefit should be liberally construed in favor in the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.”* Federal law prohibits the ***”denial of participation”*** from this business establishment as found under **28 CFR §36.202**. Colleges and universities are businesses. Under **28 CFR §36.202(c)** further states that unless I have been individually assessed as a ***“direct threat”*** you may not exclude me from the same and equal services as others. Denying service is a violation of **Title II, III, and VII of the U.S. Civil Right Act of 1964**. Title III Sections **28 CFR §36.202(a)(b)(c)** and **28 CFR §36.203(a)(b)(c)** state that I shall not be denied the same participation and equal access as everyone else. The law prohibits Alaska Airlines or Delta Airlines and others from treating anyone differently or from serving anyone separately. **21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1)** - **Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies** (A) Required conditions: (ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed— (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product; (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and **(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.** OSHA released its new ***guidance*** on April 20 under a “Frequently Asked Questions” section of its website having to do with COVID-19 safety compliance. NOTE the word 'guidance' is **not** law by any means, but rather a recommendation or a suggestion. Q: If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable? A: If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under **29 CFR 1904.6** and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in **29 CFR 1904.7**. Furthermore, demanding an individual to be vaccinated or to wear a face mask as a precondition for employment or entering a business may be liable for any resulting injuries. Face masks are designated by the FDA as a medical device and regulated under 21 CFR 878.4040. Herewith, demanding an employee or store patron to wear a mask is the unlicensed practice of medicine. Ordering employees, vendors and patrons to accept medical advice from business personnel or store attendants (wearing a face mask or other) is not only a crime (unlicensed practice of medicine), but violates the 42 US Code §2000(a); Public Accommodations, which prohibits discrimination of people with a disability and certain religious convictions. Simply stated, the employer and employees have no idea of my medical condition and are not licensed or insured medical practitioners. The Employer or Store Manager and other employees are prohibited by law from giving medical advice, such as advising employees or patrons to wear face masks or to be vaccinated. In general, the unlawful practice of medicine is regarded as the advice given specific to a particular person's illness or injury, and has the weight of authority and the possibility of doing harm. A typical State Code or Statute states: > “It is unlawful for any person to practice medicine by offering or undertaking to prevent or to diagnose, correct, or treat in any manner or by any means, methods, devices, or instrumentalities, any disease, illness, pain, wound, fracture, infirmity, deformity or defect of any person;” A condition of employment or public accommodation to anyone who conscientiously objects against being vaccinated or to wear a face mask, whether it is for religious or medical reasons, most certainly falls under the legal definition of experiencing **'duress'** as a result of the unlawful practice of medicine. Black’s Law Dictionary defines duress as: > “Any unlawful threat or coercion used by a person, to induce another to act (or to refrain from acting) in a manner he or she otherwise would not (or would).” Subjecting person to improper pressure which overcomes his will and coerces him to comply with demand to which he would not yield if acting as free agent. Head v. Gadaden Civil Service BD., Ala.Civ., 389 So.2d 516, 519. Coersion is also defined as -- "a threat to expose a secret or deformity, publish a defamatory statement, or otherwise to expose any person to disgrace or ridicule." An employer forcing a person to wear a mask because they are not vaccinated fits the unlawful act of coersion. Furthermore, experiencing duress as a result of an employer, or business or store attendant who “follows, monitors, or pursues another, whether in person or through any available technological or other means” is unlawful harassment. The key factor is when: “mental distress, mental suffering, or mental anguish as demonstrated by a victim's response to an act” occurs as a result of being wrongly denied their right due to their medical condition or religious belief and under the duress of the employee being discriminated against or fired or the store manager calling the police. Employers and stores are dicta prius, not an insured medical practitioner, nor is it equipped to respond to medical emergencies created by its own rules (that violate the law and its own policies). If an employee or patron was forced to act on the employer’s or store’s medical advice and then experienced a medical emergency, the person and entity is liable henceforth to any injuries that may occur and may also be criminally negligent. For the duration of the COVID-19 public health emergency declared pursuant to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d), this Act makes it **unlawful** under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act for any person, partnership, or corporation to engage in a deceptive act or practice in or affecting commerce associated with the treatment, cure, prevention, mitigation, or diagnosis of COVID–19 or a government benefit related to COVID–19. The Act provides that such a violation shall be treated as a violation of a rule defining an unfair or deceptive act or practice prescribed under Sec. 18(a)(1)(B) of the FTC Act. **Section 242 of Title 18**, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of **Section 242**, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any. **TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242** Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

[–] • 0 pt

WORD!

Thanks for all of them!

link

[–] • 1 pt

Here's more.

RESOURCES TO FIGHT VAXX AND MASK MANDATES, VAXX INJURIES -- INCLUDING LAWYERS TO REPRESENT US and TREATMENT OPTIONS / SOURCES FOR HCQ & IVERMECTIN

NOTE : Do not try to fight this alone. If at all possible, find others to stand with you. And get a law firm behind you. .................... America's Frontline Doctors https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/ In particular: LEGAL RESOURCES -- INCLUDING LAWYER'S WHO'LL REPRESENT US https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/legal/ MEDICAL -- HCQ / Ivermectin Rx and MASK EXEMPTIONS https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/treatments/ .............. Thomas Renz // Renz Law https://renz-law.com His entire firm is dedicated to fighting for "Medical Freedom." They work closely with Frontline Docs. https://renz-law.com/our-medical-freedom-fight 45K DEATH COUNT FROM COVID SHOT LAWSUIT -- Copy of Complaint and Whistleblower Declaration https://renz-law.com/45k-whistleblower-suit ................ SIDNEY POWELL -- DEFENDING THE REPUBLIC -- LEGAL INFO TO PUSH BACK AGAINST THE VAXX https://defendingtherepublic.org/covid/ Employer Assumption of Liability & RELIGIOUS EXEMPTIONS ‘Form Examplars’ for you to use or to consult with an attorney. Assumption of Liability –- in the case of mandatory vaccinations to retain employment or for other work or school related benefits, consider to demand that the employer or school have an authorized representative sign the assumption of liability agreement. A refusal to sign this will make more clear your right to refuse the jab to the organization pressuring you. Religious exemption (form for Protestants & Catholics) -– in the case of mandatory vaccinations to retain employment or for other work or school related benefits, if you have a religious basis to be exempt, consider the drafts provided here and if your basis for an exemption differs, draft your own, or have an attorney draft a version using these examples but consistent with your religious reason. .................. Barnes Law (Robert Barnes) https://www.barneslawllp.com Vaccine Mandate Protest Letter Example https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/689810/vaccine-mandate-employee-letter-example https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/upost/889925/vaccine-mandate-protest-letter ...................... Federal Law Prohibits Mandates of Emergency Use COVID Vaccines, Tests, Masks — 3 Resources You Can Use to Inform Your School or Employer https://msic69.wordpress.com/2021/07/29/federal-law-prohibits-mandates-of-emergency-use-covid-vaccines-tests-masks-3-resources-you-can-use-to-inform-your-school-or-employer/ ......................... VAXX CHOICE https://www.vaxxchoice.com/ Lots of resources, including: File a Criminal Complaint https://www.vaxxchoice.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Combined-Criminal-Complaint-w-Instructions-for-Filing-1.pdf Form to Refuse the Covid-19 Vaccine https://www.vaxxchoice.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Nuremberg-Notice-Form.pdf ................ Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) https://www.icandecide.org/ Info on how to report Covic Vaxx injuries, legal / lawsuits, vaxx research, etc. They've already won a case against an employer. Email them at: freedom@icandecide.org. ABA Journal article about Siri & Glimstad -- NYC legal firm working with ICAN to send out vaxx cease and desist letters, etc. https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/this-law-firm-is-fighting-mandatory-covid-19-vaccines-with-legal-filings-and-warnings/

Liberty Counsel Action https://lcaction.org/ Vaccine Memo here: https://lcaction.org/vaccine About the organization: https://lcaction.org/about ......................... Andrew Torba -- COVID VACCINE RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION -- DOWNLOAD -- DOCUMENTS HERE https://news.gab.com/2021/07/29/important-download-covid-vaccine-religious-exemption-documents-here More info (including US Air Force) in the comments of this post: https://patriots.win/p/12jcvUyCsL/religious-exemption-from-questio/c/ .................... Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance Shit ton of info / resources on Ivermectin https://covid19criticalcare.com Another pede reports this group will prescribe Ivermectin over the phone https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19 How to Get Ivermectin--List of Docs who'll prescribe via phone / Zoom https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/how-to-get-ivermectin Directory of Doctors Prescribing Outpatient Covid Therapy (Ivermectin) https://www.exstnc.com Latest peer-reviewed research: Immediate global ivermectin use will end COVID-19 pandemic https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2021-05/fccc-lpr050621.php#.YJX_rGQHFVk.wordpress ................ Siri & Glimstad (NYC law firm) This firm is fighting mandatory COVID-19 vaccines with legal filings and warnings https://www.sirillp.com/ See the "Practice Area" of website for Vaccine Injury and Vaccine Exemptions information Article about the firm and what they're doing: https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/this-law-firm-is-fighting-mandatory-covid-19-vaccines-with-legal-filings-and-warnings/ ................ Curated Collection of the best mask studies and common sense arguments: https://patriots.win/p/HEgcXddD/forcing-me-to-wear-political-sym/ ..................... Here's another form for people to consider using when their employer us mandating jabs: https://pandemic.solari.com/form-for-employees-whose-employers-are-requiring-covid-19-injections ..................... Oh, You Demand My Vax Papers? Well Then... Let's Go One Step Further https://patriots.win/p/12jcY1Oq1J/oh-you-demand-my-vax-papers-well/c/ NOTE: Post appears to be carried over from the 4chan / 8kun. Gives (if true) a VERY interesting approach to short-circuiting the whole Employee Mandate crap. ....................... COVID TREATMENTS -- ALTERNATIVES TO THE CLOT SHOT. POST WHAT YOU HAVE GATHERED ANONS. THE VACCINES ARE POISONOUS https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/12jcY4nTHf/covid-treatments--alternatives-t/ ........................... here are some really fantastic sites to add to your copypasta. they list all studies related to covid: https://c19ivermectin.com https://c19hcq.com https://c19vitamind.com https://c19early.com ............................... Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) Legal Resources https://aapsonline.org/category/legal_matters/ Open Letter from Physicians to Universities: Allow Students Back Without COVID Vaccine Mandate https://aapsonline.org/open-letter-from-physicians-to-universities-reverse-covid-vaccine-mandates/ .......................... "This person has created a very well sourced list of 18 reasons" 18 Reasons I Won’t Be Getting a COVID Vaccine (Source: TheDefender) https://archive.is/CTmVV#selection-1073.0-1077.175 FTA “I'm not here to pick a fight with anyone, just to walk you through some of what I've read, my lingering questions and explain why I can't make sense of these COVID vaccines.”

Rights and Freedoms: Covid-19 https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com Federal Law Prohibits Mandates of Emergency Use COVID Vaccines, Tests, Masks — 3 Resources You Can Use to Inform Your School or Employer https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/05/22/federal-law-prohibits-mandates-of-emergency-use-covid-vaccines-tests-masks-3-resources-you-can-use-to-inform-your-school-or-employer ............................. Need a Vaccine Exemption? Here Are Pre-Formatted Letters You Can Use NOTE: Article clearly states these are unvetted and have not been written / approved by lawyers -- use at your own risk. https://noqreport.com/2021/07/30/need-a-vaccine-exemption-here-are-pre-formatted-letters-you-can-use/ ............................ Children's Health Defense (EUROPE) https://childrenshealthdefense.org/ Legal Resources https://childrenshealthdefense.org/legal/legal-resources Notices Notice for EUA Masks / Notice for EUA Testing / Notice for EUA Vaccines Advocacy Preventing Vaccine Mandates Toolkit / Detailed Longer Letter to School Districts or Universities / Shorter COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Letter for Colleges / 50-state Update on Pending Legislation Pertaining to Employer-mandated Vaccinations .................... Ivermectin Info Received By Friend Subbed To Email List Post (including comments) includes links to buy Ivermectin, Docs who'll prescribe it, and non-prescription sources for Ivermectin paste (veterinary use but safe for humans) and dosing instructions. https://patriots.win/p/12jchLJaol/ivermectin-info-received-by-frie/c/ .......................... Chart with the lists of treatment. I believe the first row is for treatment after vax https://greatawakening.win/p/12jchNZYVk/to-the-help-wanted--friend-that-/c/ https://media.communities.win/post/C8Z7ddQD.jpeg Image Source: Protocol for Treating Covid-19 (non-vaxx) https://twitter.com/nia3in/status/1411332149236715521 ........................... Facts about Covid-19 (Swiss Policy Research) https://swprs.org/covid19-facts Covid-19 Treatment Protocol (Dr. Vladimir Zelenko) -- common sense information https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/zelenko-treatment-protocol/

Here's more. RESOURCES TO FIGHT VAXX AND MASK MANDATES, VAXX INJURIES -- INCLUDING LAWYERS TO REPRESENT US and TREATMENT OPTIONS / SOURCES FOR HCQ & IVERMECTIN NOTE : Do not try to fight this alone. If at all possible, find others to stand with you. And get a law firm behind you. .................... America's Frontline Doctors https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/ In particular: LEGAL RESOURCES -- INCLUDING LAWYER'S WHO'LL REPRESENT US https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/legal/ MEDICAL -- HCQ / Ivermectin Rx and MASK EXEMPTIONS https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/treatments/ .............. Thomas Renz // Renz Law https://renz-law.com His entire firm is dedicated to fighting for "Medical Freedom." They work closely with Frontline Docs. https://renz-law.com/our-medical-freedom-fight 45K DEATH COUNT FROM COVID SHOT LAWSUIT -- Copy of Complaint and Whistleblower Declaration https://renz-law.com/45k-whistleblower-suit ................ SIDNEY POWELL -- DEFENDING THE REPUBLIC -- LEGAL INFO TO PUSH BACK AGAINST THE VAXX https://defendingtherepublic.org/covid/ Employer Assumption of Liability & RELIGIOUS EXEMPTIONS ‘Form Examplars’ for you to use or to consult with an attorney. Assumption of Liability –- in the case of mandatory vaccinations to retain employment or for other work or school related benefits, consider to demand that the employer or school have an authorized representative sign the assumption of liability agreement. A refusal to sign this will make more clear your right to refuse the jab to the organization pressuring you. Religious exemption (form for Protestants & Catholics) -– in the case of mandatory vaccinations to retain employment or for other work or school related benefits, if you have a religious basis to be exempt, consider the drafts provided here and if your basis for an exemption differs, draft your own, or have an attorney draft a version using these examples but consistent with your religious reason. .................. Barnes Law (Robert Barnes) https://www.barneslawllp.com Vaccine Mandate Protest Letter Example https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/689810/vaccine-mandate-employee-letter-example https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/upost/889925/vaccine-mandate-protest-letter ...................... Federal Law Prohibits Mandates of Emergency Use COVID Vaccines, Tests, Masks — 3 Resources You Can Use to Inform Your School or Employer https://msic69.wordpress.com/2021/07/29/federal-law-prohibits-mandates-of-emergency-use-covid-vaccines-tests-masks-3-resources-you-can-use-to-inform-your-school-or-employer/ ......................... VAXX CHOICE https://www.vaxxchoice.com/ Lots of resources, including: File a Criminal Complaint https://www.vaxxchoice.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Combined-Criminal-Complaint-w-Instructions-for-Filing-1.pdf Form to Refuse the Covid-19 Vaccine https://www.vaxxchoice.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Nuremberg-Notice-Form.pdf ................ Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) https://www.icandecide.org/ Info on how to report Covic Vaxx injuries, legal / lawsuits, vaxx research, etc. They've already won a case against an employer. Email them at: freedom@icandecide.org. ABA Journal article about Siri & Glimstad -- NYC legal firm working with ICAN to send out vaxx cease and desist letters, etc. https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/this-law-firm-is-fighting-mandatory-covid-19-vaccines-with-legal-filings-and-warnings/ Liberty Counsel Action https://lcaction.org/ Vaccine Memo here: https://lcaction.org/vaccine About the organization: https://lcaction.org/about ......................... Andrew Torba -- COVID VACCINE RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION -- DOWNLOAD -- DOCUMENTS HERE https://news.gab.com/2021/07/29/important-download-covid-vaccine-religious-exemption-documents-here More info (including US Air Force) in the comments of this post: https://patriots.win/p/12jcvUyCsL/religious-exemption-from-questio/c/ .................... Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance Shit ton of info / resources on Ivermectin https://covid19criticalcare.com Another pede reports this group will prescribe Ivermectin over the phone https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19 How to Get Ivermectin--List of Docs who'll prescribe via phone / Zoom https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/how-to-get-ivermectin Directory of Doctors Prescribing Outpatient Covid Therapy (Ivermectin) https://www.exstnc.com Latest peer-reviewed research: Immediate global ivermectin use will end COVID-19 pandemic https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2021-05/fccc-lpr050621.php#.YJX_rGQHFVk.wordpress ................ Siri & Glimstad (NYC law firm) This firm is fighting mandatory COVID-19 vaccines with legal filings and warnings https://www.sirillp.com/ See the "Practice Area" of website for Vaccine Injury and Vaccine Exemptions information Article about the firm and what they're doing: https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/this-law-firm-is-fighting-mandatory-covid-19-vaccines-with-legal-filings-and-warnings/ ................ Curated Collection of the best mask studies and common sense arguments: https://patriots.win/p/HEgcXddD/forcing-me-to-wear-political-sym/ ..................... Here's another form for people to consider using when their employer us mandating jabs: https://pandemic.solari.com/form-for-employees-whose-employers-are-requiring-covid-19-injections ..................... Oh, You Demand My Vax Papers? Well Then... Let's Go One Step Further https://patriots.win/p/12jcY1Oq1J/oh-you-demand-my-vax-papers-well/c/ NOTE: Post appears to be carried over from the 4chan / 8kun. Gives (if true) a VERY interesting approach to short-circuiting the whole Employee Mandate crap. ....................... COVID TREATMENTS -- ALTERNATIVES TO THE CLOT SHOT. POST WHAT YOU HAVE GATHERED ANONS. THE VACCINES ARE POISONOUS https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/12jcY4nTHf/covid-treatments--alternatives-t/ ........................... here are some really fantastic sites to add to your copypasta. they list all studies related to covid: https://c19ivermectin.com https://c19hcq.com https://c19vitamind.com https://c19early.com ............................... Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) Legal Resources https://aapsonline.org/category/legal_matters/ Open Letter from Physicians to Universities: Allow Students Back Without COVID Vaccine Mandate https://aapsonline.org/open-letter-from-physicians-to-universities-reverse-covid-vaccine-mandates/ .......................... "This person has created a very well sourced list of 18 reasons" 18 Reasons I Won’t Be Getting a COVID Vaccine (Source: TheDefender) https://archive.is/CTmVV#selection-1073.0-1077.175 FTA “I'm not here to pick a fight with anyone, just to walk you through some of what I've read, my lingering questions and explain why I can't make sense of these COVID vaccines.” Rights and Freedoms: Covid-19 https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com Federal Law Prohibits Mandates of Emergency Use COVID Vaccines, Tests, Masks — 3 Resources You Can Use to Inform Your School or Employer https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/05/22/federal-law-prohibits-mandates-of-emergency-use-covid-vaccines-tests-masks-3-resources-you-can-use-to-inform-your-school-or-employer ............................. Need a Vaccine Exemption? Here Are Pre-Formatted Letters You Can Use NOTE: Article clearly states these are unvetted and have not been written / approved by lawyers -- use at your own risk. https://noqreport.com/2021/07/30/need-a-vaccine-exemption-here-are-pre-formatted-letters-you-can-use/ ............................ Children's Health Defense (EUROPE) https://childrenshealthdefense.org/ Legal Resources https://childrenshealthdefense.org/legal/legal-resources Notices Notice for EUA Masks / Notice for EUA Testing / Notice for EUA Vaccines Advocacy Preventing Vaccine Mandates Toolkit / Detailed Longer Letter to School Districts or Universities / Shorter COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Letter for Colleges / 50-state Update on Pending Legislation Pertaining to Employer-mandated Vaccinations .................... Ivermectin Info Received By Friend Subbed To Email List Post (including comments) includes links to buy Ivermectin, Docs who'll prescribe it, and non-prescription sources for Ivermectin paste (veterinary use but safe for humans) and dosing instructions. https://patriots.win/p/12jchLJaol/ivermectin-info-received-by-frie/c/ .......................... Chart with the lists of treatment. I believe the first row is for treatment after vax https://greatawakening.win/p/12jchNZYVk/to-the-help-wanted--friend-that-/c/ https://media.communities.win/post/C8Z7ddQD.jpeg Image Source: Protocol for Treating Covid-19 (non-vaxx) https://twitter.com/nia3in/status/1411332149236715521 ........................... Facts about Covid-19 (Swiss Policy Research) https://swprs.org/covid19-facts Covid-19 Treatment Protocol (Dr. Vladimir Zelenko) -- common sense information https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/zelenko-treatment-protocol/

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Grateful for it all. Thanks again!

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

And thank you too. You're welcome to spread this info far and wide.

parent
link

[+] [deleted] • 5 pts

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

No offense to you, good sir, but it’s also illegal to spy on American citizens without cause and it’s also illegal to lie to obtain FISA warrants.

It’s also illegal to steal an election. So I mean…

The enemy is within the gates.

We are at war. Let's not give up. We must stick together. We will win.

I find the following most compelling and inspiring.

What means this archaic term "law"???

Well, this is :

Vaccine Related

Are adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine recordable on the OSHA recordkeeping log?

DOL and OSHA, as well as other federal agencies, are working diligently to encourage COVID-19 vaccinations. OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination efforts. As a result, OSHA will not enforce 29 CFR 1904’s recording requirements to require any employers to record worker side effects from COVID-19 vaccination through May 2022. We will reevaluate the agency’s position at that time to determine the best course of action moving forward.

And to no one's surprise, it's all been changed/reversed.

[–] • 2 pts

The science for respirators doesn't change. Read OSHA's long standing regulations below:

OSHA defines the term “respirator” as Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and regarding the face mask guidelines, it most often refers to the N95 face mask. OSHA has issued COVID-19 guidelines that pertain to these respirators.

OSHA does not consider cloth face coverings (whether homemade or commercially produced) to be Personal Protection equipment (PPE). This does not exempt businesses from liability to injury as a result of this policy. Cloth face coverings don’t protect employees from airborne infectious agents because of their loose fit and lack of seal or adequate filtration. https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/covid-19/covid-19-faq.html

Furthermore, OSHA references that the CDC reported that more research is needed on the scope of their protection and filtration levels. https://ohsonline.com/articles/2020/11/19/osha-updates-faq-to-include-comment-on-cloth-face-masks.aspx

The OSHA “General Rule” states employers must create a workplace from perceived risks that are causing or are probably going to make demise, or genuine physical damage his representatives.

This provision thereto specifies that every business should follow word related well-being and well-being measures proclaimed under OSHA.

https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/1998-01-08

“Human beings must breathe oxygen . . . to survive, and begin to suffer adverse health effects when the oxygen level of their breathing air drops below [19.5 percent oxygen]. Below 19.5 percent oxygen . . . , air is considered oxygen-deficient. At concentrations of 16 to 19.5 percent, workers engaged in any form of exertion can rapidly become symptomatic as their tissues fail to obtain the oxygen necessary to function properly (Rom, W., Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2nd ed.; Little, Brown; Boston, 1992). Increased breathing rates, accelerated heartbeat, and impaired thinking or coordination occur more quickly in an oxygen-deficient environment. Even a momentary loss of coordination may be devastating to a worker if it occurs while the worker is performing a potentially dangerous activity, such as climbing a ladder. Concentrations of 12 to 16 percent oxygen cause tachypnea (increased breathing rates), tachycardia (accelerated heartbeat), and impaired attention, thinking, and coordination (e.g., Ex. 25-4), even in people who are resting.

At oxygen levels of 10 to 14 percent, faulty judgment, intermittent respiration, and exhaustion can be expected even with minimal exertion (Exs. 25-4 and 150). Breathing air containing 6 to 10 percent oxygen results in nausea, vomiting, lethargic movements, and perhaps unconsciousness. Breathing air containing less than 6 percent oxygen produces convulsions, then apnea (cessation of breathing), followed by cardiac standstill. These symptoms occur immediately. Even if a worker survives the hypoxic insult, organs may show evidence of hypoxic damage, which may be irreversible (Exs. 25-4 and 150; also reported in Rom, W. [see reference in previous paragraph]).

OSHA further states the following:

“In some cases, respirator use itself can cause illness and injury to employees. There are a number of physiological burdens that are associated with the use of certain types of respirators. The weight of the respirator, breathing resistances during both normal operation and if the air-purifying element is overloaded, and rebreathing exhaled air from respirator "dead space" can all increase the physiologic burden of respirator use (Exs. 113, 22-1, 64-427). Job and workplace conditions, such as the length of time a respirator must be worn, the level of physical exertion required of a respirator user, and environmental conditions, can also affect the physiological burden (Exs. 113, 64-363). In addition, workers who wear glasses or hearing aids may have problems achieving appropriate fit with some respirator face pieces.” https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/1998-01-08

OSHA standards for respirators have not gone away. They were in my view concealed from the public for this Plandemic to take hold.

In fact, surgical masks are regulated under 21 CFR 878.4040. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is revoking the Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) for non-NIOSH-approved disposable respirators (revocation effective July 6, 2021) and the EUAs for decontamination and bioburden reduction systems (revocation effective June 30, 2021). As of the effective date of the revocations, these devices will no longer be authorized for use by health care personnel in health care settings. These actions are in follow-up to the May 27, 2021, letter in which the FDA recommended a transition away from non-NIOSH-approved disposable respirators as well as from reusing decontaminated or bioburden-reduced disposable respirators.

This is for healthcare facilities. However, this gives impetus to OSHA and in other working environments. OSHA already doesn't classify face cloths and bandannas. Therefore, they are not regulated. This means there is liability for any employer allowing these not approved masks.

We don't need to have people drop on the floor because of the medical conditions due to the mandates. Mark my words. This will surely happen. I can easily see 'someone' out-of-work needing income and having a sudden 'medical condition' as a result of the store's face mask mandate. Lawsuits can very easily start taking off. The cabal uses 'crisis actors' for their social engineering endeavors. If one wants it, it is possible.

Yep, 'someone' got to them. Using OSHA as a reason not to vaXXXinate is probably aweak argument. Notwithstanding, face masks in the work place has the precedent that matters. OSHA cannot conceal the science that has long and consistently formulated their regulations. The science for respirators doesn't change. Read OSHA's long standing regulations below: OSHA defines the term “respirator” as Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and regarding the face mask guidelines, it most often refers to the N95 face mask. OSHA has issued COVID-19 guidelines that pertain to these respirators. OSHA does not consider cloth face coverings (whether homemade or commercially produced) to be Personal Protection equipment (PPE). This does not exempt businesses from liability to injury as a result of this policy. Cloth face coverings don’t protect employees from airborne infectious agents because of their loose fit and lack of seal or adequate filtration. https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/covid-19/covid-19-faq.html Furthermore, OSHA references that the CDC reported that more research is needed on the scope of their protection and filtration levels. https://ohsonline.com/articles/2020/11/19/osha-updates-faq-to-include-comment-on-cloth-face-masks.aspx The OSHA “General Rule” states employers must create a workplace from perceived risks that are causing or are probably going to make demise, or genuine physical damage his representatives. This provision thereto specifies that every business should follow word related well-being and well-being measures proclaimed under OSHA. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/1998-01-08 “Human beings must breathe oxygen . . . to survive, and begin to suffer adverse health effects when the oxygen level of their breathing air drops below [19.5 percent oxygen]. Below 19.5 percent oxygen . . . , air is considered oxygen-deficient. At concentrations of 16 to 19.5 percent, workers engaged in any form of exertion can rapidly become symptomatic as their tissues fail to obtain the oxygen necessary to function properly (Rom, W., Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2nd ed.; Little, Brown; Boston, 1992). Increased breathing rates, accelerated heartbeat, and impaired thinking or coordination occur more quickly in an oxygen-deficient environment. Even a momentary loss of coordination may be devastating to a worker if it occurs while the worker is performing a potentially dangerous activity, such as climbing a ladder. Concentrations of 12 to 16 percent oxygen cause tachypnea (increased breathing rates), tachycardia (accelerated heartbeat), and impaired attention, thinking, and coordination (e.g., Ex. 25-4), even in people who are resting. At oxygen levels of 10 to 14 percent, faulty judgment, intermittent respiration, and exhaustion can be expected even with minimal exertion (Exs. 25-4 and 150). Breathing air containing 6 to 10 percent oxygen results in nausea, vomiting, lethargic movements, and perhaps unconsciousness. Breathing air containing less than 6 percent oxygen produces convulsions, then apnea (cessation of breathing), followed by cardiac standstill. These symptoms occur immediately. Even if a worker survives the hypoxic insult, organs may show evidence of hypoxic damage, which may be irreversible (Exs. 25-4 and 150; also reported in Rom, W. [see reference in previous paragraph]). OSHA further states the following: “In some cases, respirator use itself can cause illness and injury to employees. There are a number of physiological burdens that are associated with the use of certain types of respirators. The weight of the respirator, breathing resistances during both normal operation and if the air-purifying element is overloaded, and rebreathing exhaled air from respirator "dead space" can all increase the physiologic burden of respirator use (Exs. 113, 22-1, 64-427). Job and workplace conditions, such as the length of time a respirator must be worn, the level of physical exertion required of a respirator user, and environmental conditions, can also affect the physiological burden (Exs. 113, 64-363). In addition, workers who wear glasses or hearing aids may have problems achieving appropriate fit with some respirator face pieces.” https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/1998-01-08 OSHA standards for respirators have not gone away. They were in my view concealed from the public for this Plandemic to take hold. In fact, surgical masks are regulated under 21 CFR 878.4040. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is revoking the Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) for non-NIOSH-approved disposable respirators (revocation effective July 6, 2021) and the EUAs for decontamination and bioburden reduction systems (revocation effective June 30, 2021). As of the effective date of the revocations, these devices will no longer be authorized for use by health care personnel in health care settings. These actions are in follow-up to the May 27, 2021, letter in which the FDA recommended a transition away from non-NIOSH-approved disposable respirators as well as from reusing decontaminated or bioburden-reduced disposable respirators. This is for healthcare facilities. However, this gives impetus to OSHA and in other working environments. OSHA already doesn't classify face cloths and bandannas. Therefore, they are not regulated. This means there is liability for any employer allowing these not approved masks. We don't need to have people drop on the floor because of the medical conditions due to the mandates. Mark my words. This will surely happen. I can easily see 'someone' out-of-work needing income and having a sudden 'medical condition' as a result of the store's face mask mandate. Lawsuits can very easily start taking off. The cabal uses 'crisis actors' for their social engineering endeavors. If one wants it, it is possible.

Well considering the entire nation is now an unlawful mess run by criminals FOR criminals just HOW exactly does pointing this out TO the criminals change anything? just asking.

There two things that kill the soul: despair and false hope. – St. Augustine.

We are at war. The rule of law is predominant throughout the course of history. Whenever lawlessness breaks out, as it is now, it never lasts. It can take a vicious turn. It is for this reason why we need to fight lawlessness to return to a civil society. I know this is obvious, but it bears repeating. Sitting on one's donk complaining about how bad it is, is preaching the same sermon to the choir over and over again.

Sitting on one's donk complaining about how bad it is, is preaching the same sermon to the choir over and over again.

That sums up the whole Q movement in a nutshell. Sitting and waiting to be saved and then when that doesn't happen sitting and waiting some more and posting stories in an echo chamber so you feel better about doing pretty much nothing. We are WAY past that. Fighting for one's rights or Country or to even survive is just that, a FIGHT. The other side is NOT going to play by any made up rules or high road the way the right does. I'm not even sure anymore if the right ever really believed that or if it was just an excuse for not fighting. But posting stories, "waking people up", pointing out the obvious, Voting etc have all PROVEN to be absolutely useless against the enemy. Whether or not you and I agree on it is irrelevant but I think we both KNOW there's only one course of action left IF you ever want to see that civil society again. It starts with the removal of the uncivilized.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

civil society

Civil Society has been commandeered by Omidyar - now is the same as Soros Open Society - same goals. Check it out: https://poal.co/s/QPatriots/366052

I know you were using "cs" as a phrase but I'm just pointing out that it's been infiltrated (like everything else)

Load more (1 reply)

"That sums up the whole Q movement in a nutshell."

And how are you different? Will you explain to us what your plans are to change the current situation? What has been doing is an excellent model to follow. Her work and getting the word out about Pierre Omidyar and the election racket is the type of action that one can duplicate. Getting on your street and protesting might be another. It depends on who you are and your preference toward the call of action. This is a Sub for research and news. Sitting on one's donk complaining about how bad things are, is laundering the same message over again. If you have something else in mind, tell us.

" I'm not even sure anymore if the right ever really believed that or if it was just an excuse for not fighting."

That's because the infiltration and brainwashing is far more pervasive in 'conservative' circles than most people yet understand. The following is a very good example of it. If you are familiar with Nick Fuentes, listen to why he is . Also, this is what Gab's Andrew Torba says .

So we all know the 'system' is corrupt as hell, but do we really? How about looking at Bill Gill and what he exposed. He has put not only his career and business on the line, but his life. They tried to kill him 3 times, but they failed thanks to the grace of God. I love this guy. Thanks for sending me this information. Sharing this type of information, connects with people who view it. Depending on the individual, one or more people really inspired by him may decide to become another Bill Gill. I say there is power in that. That's what we want. I'd like to see a million more Bill Gills or even 10 million of them.

Load more (2 replies)

Pfizer is going for FDA approval early next month.

https://www.google.com/search?q=fda+approval+of+vaccine&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS859US859&oq=fda+approval+of+vaccine&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i512j0i324j0i22i30l7.4714j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Another legal peril for the vaXXXine companies if and when the FDA does approve the gene therapy treatment is they may loose their immunity against lawsuits. The legal medical definition for vaccine cannot be changed post hoc. By referring to COVID-19 vaccines as “vaccines” rather than gene therapies, the U.S. government is violating its 15 U.S. Code Section 41, which regulates deceptive practices in medical claims. Per this law, it is unlawful to advertise:

“… that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made.”

The mRNA gene treatment does not fit the legal definition of vaccine. As noted by David Martin, Ph.D., Moderna’s SEC filings specify and stress that the FDA considers its technology a “gene therapy technology,” originally intended for cancer treatment. Its mechanism of action also confirms it to be gene therapy. The mRNA gene therapies currently being misleadingly marketed as “vaccines” turn your cells into bioreactors that churn out viral proteins to incite an immune response, and there’s no off-switch.

The Phamaceutical Immunity Act, 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22 - Standards of responsibility is specifically for vaccines.

(1) No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.

(2)For purposes of paragraph (1), a vaccine shall be presumed to be accompanied by proper directions and warnings if the vaccine manufacturer shows that it complied in all material respects with all requirements under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.] and section 262 of this title (including regulations issued under such provisions) applicable to the vaccine and related to vaccine-related injury or death for which the civil action was brought unless the plaintiff shows— (A)that the manufacturer engaged in the conduct set forth in subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 300aa–23(d)(2) of this title, or (B)by clear and convincing evidence that the manufacturer failed to exercise due care notwithstanding its compliance with such Act and section (and regulations issued under such provisions). (c)Direct warnings

In the above, vaccine-related injury or death is defined: (5) The term “vaccine-related injury or death” means an illness, injury, condition, or death associated with one or more of the vaccines set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table, except that the term does not include an illness, injury, condition, or death associated with an adulterant or contaminant intentionally added to such a vaccine.

As long as the U.S. is under a state of emergency, things like PCR tests and COVID-19 “vaccines” are allowed under emergency use authorization. And, as long as the emergency use authorization is in effect, the makers of these experimental gene therapies are not financially liable for any harm that comes from their use.

That is, provided they’re “vaccines.” If these injections are NOT vaccines, then the liability shield falls away, because there is no liability shield for a medical emergency countermeasure that is gene therapy.

The vaXXXine companies are in legal jeopardy when the EAU is removed.

Even with this, no one can force a jab. Vaccines are not federally mandated. Many States have religious and medical exemptions. The laws I provided are in full force. No executive order can override one's Rights. Another legal peril for the vaXXXine companies if and when the FDA does approve the gene therapy treatment is they may loose their immunity against lawsuits. The legal medical definition for vaccine cannot be changed post hoc. By referring to COVID-19 vaccines as “vaccines” rather than gene therapies, the U.S. government is violating its 15 U.S. Code Section 41, which regulates deceptive practices in medical claims. Per this law, it is unlawful to advertise: > “… that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made.” The mRNA gene treatment does not fit the legal definition of vaccine. As noted by David Martin, Ph.D., Moderna’s SEC filings specify and stress that the FDA considers its technology a “gene therapy technology,” originally intended for cancer treatment. Its mechanism of action also confirms it to be gene therapy. The mRNA gene therapies currently being misleadingly marketed as “vaccines” turn your cells into bioreactors that churn out viral proteins to incite an immune response, and there’s no off-switch. The Phamaceutical Immunity Act, 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22 - Standards of responsibility is specifically for vaccines. (1) No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings. (2)For purposes of paragraph (1), a vaccine shall be presumed to be accompanied by proper directions and warnings if the vaccine manufacturer shows that it complied in all material respects with all requirements under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.] and section 262 of this title (including regulations issued under such provisions) applicable to the vaccine and related to vaccine-related injury or death for which the civil action was brought unless the plaintiff shows— (A)that the manufacturer engaged in the conduct set forth in subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 300aa–23(d)(2) of this title, or (B)by clear and convincing evidence that the manufacturer failed to exercise due care notwithstanding its compliance with such Act and section (and regulations issued under such provisions). (c)Direct warnings In the above, vaccine-related injury or death is defined: (5) The term “vaccine-related injury or death” means an illness, injury, condition, or death associated with one or more of the vaccines set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table, except that the term does not include an illness, injury, condition, or death associated with an adulterant or contaminant intentionally added to such a vaccine. As long as the U.S. is under a state of emergency, things like PCR tests and COVID-19 “vaccines” are allowed under emergency use authorization. And, as long as the emergency use authorization is in effect, the makers of these experimental gene therapies are not financially liable for any harm that comes from their use. That is, provided they’re “vaccines.” If these injections are NOT vaccines, then the liability shield falls away, because there is no liability shield for a medical emergency countermeasure that is gene therapy. The vaXXXine companies are in legal jeopardy when the EAU is removed.

Dude. Again, I agree with you on principle, but this “no executive order can override rights” has already happened. Repeatedly. With no pushback whatsoever. Rights were stripped from American citizens in damn near 50 state of our union. That horse is out of the corral already.

The constitution was thrown out the window when Trump sat there and watched executive orders override peoples rights and he did absolutely nothing about it. It was well within his power to put a stop to that bullshit and arrest the governors that did it. He didn’t. We set a new low bar that can never be undone.

I got killed for saying it in 2019, that this was the final straw. We fight back now, here, or it’s over. I had Trump supporters excusing his complete lack of action to protect the constitutional rights of American citizens and now those same people are moaning and wailing about lost rights.

Told ya.

Okay, you believe what you want to believe. I'll continue believing in the precedent of law and order. Told ya.

(post is archived)